31–40 of 50 posts
I see people flagging this and accurately questioning project veritas’ agenda. My question is - Are these documents genuine? Isn’t that that what matters?
I see people flagging this and accurately questioning project veritas’ agenda. My question is - Are these documents genuine? Isn’t that that what matters?
Context also matters. Veritas has repeatedly and intentionally taken information out of context to skew the message.
Just a regular file download, no funky extra downloader apps necessary.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context also matters. Veritas has repeatedly and intentionally taken information out of context to skew the message.
Context is irrelevent in regards to raw documentation. Claim it's fake or address it's contents.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context is irrelevent in regards to raw documentation. Claim it's fake or address it's contents.
What do you mean? That either the entire thing must have been fabricated out of whole cloth, or that we should assume it's entirely true and discuss the implications as though it were? Wouldn't the simpler explanation be that people believe that, given the source, there is a high chance that it's somewhere in the middle - i.e. skewed, misleading, spun, taken out of context, biased - and is therefore reasonable to not…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
All I want is a discussion.
Here's a start, it is from Project Veritas, a known bad actor. The Google employee in specific has a history of Q conspiracy theories and anti-semitism. Neither of them seem very trustworthy. If it isn't very trustworthy, is it really news?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's a start, it is from Project Veritas, a known bad actor. The Google employee in specific has a history of Q conspiracy theories and anti-semitism. Neither of them seem very trustworthy. If it isn't very trustworthy, is it really news?
[flagged]