21–30 of 50 posts
Project Veritas has broken laws on several occasions, and also seems to attempt to entrap people. They tried to sell a Washington Post reporter a story about sexual impropriety from Roy Moore and then planned on outing the WaPo story as a hoax. I'd question literally anything from them as they go out of their way to entrap and falsify things up to and including breaking laws. Instead, WaPo taped the interview and did…
Truth or not, this is valuable information. I understand skepticism of Veritas but let people make up their own minds before removing it. Why flag? Edit: I really want these documents to be false, I do.
Is it actually valuable information? It will take a while to work through everything, but what do you think the odds are that there are w bunch of docs here that are missing context and therefore are misleading? Especially given PV's BS surrounding google in just the past few weeks.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I understand that, but these are Google employees. I am literally watching them tell me something. If you were Project Veritas, you would turn away a Google employee giving you inside info?
You say it's creepy that it's being flagged, but also that you understand that the source is "not reliable or trustworthy". Can you clarify your concern?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's flagged because it's Project Veritas. They are not a reliable or trustworthy source.
I understand that, but these are Google employees. I am literally watching them tell me something. If you were Project Veritas, you would turn away a Google employee giving you inside info?
Project Veritas has broken laws on several occasions, and also seems to attempt to entrap people. They tried to sell a Washington Post reporter a story about sexual impropriety from Roy Moore and then planned on outing the WaPo story as a hoax. I'd question literally anything from them as they go out of their way to entrap and falsify things up to and including breaking laws. Instead, WaPo taped the interview and did…
Ok - the messenger is bad. But are these documents real?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, very creepy that this keeps getting flagged. Super interesting news about a company we wall work with. These are google employees and I want to hear what they have to say, and talk about it with all of you, my unbiased HN friends.
All I want is a discussion.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's flagged because it's Project Veritas. They are not a reliable or trustworthy source.
I understand that, but these are Google employees. I am literally watching them tell me something. If you were Project Veritas, you would turn away a Google employee giving you inside info?
Yes. Yes I would turn it away
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok - the messenger is bad. But are these documents real?
Who knows? The messenger has manufacured false documents in the past, which was OP's point.
Bloomberg has published false and unretracted pieces, but we don’t flag them into oblivion - we evaluate each piece.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, very creepy that this keeps getting flagged. Super interesting news about a company we wall work with. These are google employees and I want to hear what they have to say, and talk about it with all of you, my unbiased HN friends.
All I want is a discussion.