Live data from Hacker News

New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

wsj.com

101–110 of 215 posts

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#101
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comcast & AT&T cast SF's into oblivion: https://www.fastcompany.com/90319916/the-anti-competitive-fo...

If I understand it correctly, the two ways that incumbents are able to kill these efforts are through lower costs and through infrastructure restrictions. Emitting radio waves is both cheaper and lower-infrastructure than laying fiber. The question in my mind is whether the quality holds up.

You forgot pay the opposition party to demagogue. Lobbying has a higher ROI and they can keep treating internet service as a luxury good instead of a commodity.

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#103

This is interesting - it says that they are connected to an internet exchange point (IXP), which means presumably they are their own AS and don't pay for peering. It makes them basically a peer of Verizon, etc.. It's a bit of a reminder of what the internet actually is - a bunch of networks connected together. If you make your own network, negotiate or purchase a piece of the IPv6 address space, and convince someone…

IX costs vary by region but in NYC you can expect around $700/m for a 10g port as a startup. Transit costs over an IX port are much higher than crossconnecting directly to a provider, but IX ports are convenient and save a lot of bandwidth cost if you’re good at building relationships. The network engineering world is very different from software. Relationships are everything and the pricing very opaque. Often pricin…

>$700/m

Is that $700 a minute, month or something else?

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds awesome. How do the payments work?

50 real USD says it's some kind of cryptocurrency nonsense.

"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#105
post #47
post #41

There's a map of community-owned networks, more than 750 communities across the United States have embraced operating their own broadband network Map here: https://muninetworks.org/communitymap

It really bothers me to see nothing going on in the Phoenix, Arizona region, where I live. I'm planning on getting my Technicians HAM license sometime soon (I took one of the online practice tests "blind" and scored an 80 - so with some study it shouldn't be a problem). Maybe after that if I can find some like-minded people nearby...

A HAM license doesn't help you: you cannot legally use the amateur radio bands to transmit an internet connection.

I suspect the Amateur HAMmers would detect and enforce that: I imagine there are HAM goonsquads.

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IX costs vary by region but in NYC you can expect around $700/m for a 10g port as a startup. Transit costs over an IX port are much higher than crossconnecting directly to a provider, but IX ports are convenient and save a lot of bandwidth cost if you’re good at building relationships. The network engineering world is very different from software. Relationships are everything and the pricing very opaque. Often pricin…

>$700/m Is that $700 a minute, month or something else?

Month. Yikes that would be expensive otherwise!

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#107

I've been very intrigued by their efforts for some time now. Last time I read about NYC Mesh, it sent me down a rabbit hole of research into mesh networks and what it takes to found an ISP. I'd love to replicate their efforts in NOLA, but the legal and technical hurdles are tricky! When I had looked into it, these resources had been helpful for research: Wireless Networking in the Developing world -- http://wndw.net/…

Hey there codexarcanum, My partner and I are NOLA based programmers / lawyers who have been researching this matter for a few years. We own the domain nolamesh.net and would love to work with you to navigate the political / legal / business issues to deploy a similar network in the New Orleans metro area. Please reach out to us at nolalawcorp@gmail.com and let's set up a meeting.

This is off to an auspicious start. Here's to seeing your "How HN helped us start an ISP in New Orleans" blog post in a few years!

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#108

I've been very intrigued by their efforts for some time now. Last time I read about NYC Mesh, it sent me down a rabbit hole of research into mesh networks and what it takes to found an ISP. I'd love to replicate their efforts in NOLA, but the legal and technical hurdles are tricky! When I had looked into it, these resources had been helpful for research: Wireless Networking in the Developing world -- http://wndw.net/…

The problem has always been that this networking technology can’t really be compared easily to wired networking, but consumers do. You adversely select for people who want reliability instead of speed, which is the opposite of what WISPs provide.

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love the project! Why does my intuition suggest big ISPs are going to try to regulate this out of existence in the US. It's depressing.

It's already illegal twice over. Anyone "forwarding" packets from a connection to an ISP is almost certainly in breach of contract. Amateur packet radio service regulations state that you may not use it for applications that are available over commercial services.

The decentralized part will be a necessary part of this then... I highly doubt it's illegal to make open source software which does this.

Re: New York City Neighbors Build Cheaper Way to Connect to Web

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love the project! Why does my intuition suggest big ISPs are going to try to regulate this out of existence in the US. It's depressing.

It's already illegal twice over. Anyone "forwarding" packets from a connection to an ISP is almost certainly in breach of contract. Amateur packet radio service regulations state that you may not use it for applications that are available over commercial services.

> Anyone "forwarding" packets from a connection to an ISP is almost certainly in breach of contract.

You can buy resaleable backhaul it's just a drag and expensive. NYC mesh gets free resaleable backhaul and it's a key thing for them.

> Amateur packet radio service regulations state that you may not use it for applications that are available over commercial services.

point to point long distance antennas on free spectrum are commercially usable and more than adequate https://www.ui.com/products/#airmax

Post reply on HN