Earlier quoted context omitted.
Edit: Damn. I think OP was being sarcastic. A quick look through the comment history shows a different view than the one expressed in the comment. I removed the downvote. ---Original comment--- Here's why I downvoted you: - It doesn't matter if the water is clean or dirty because that's not what's causing climate change. - The United States was the second largest emitter of carbon dioxide in 2015. CO2 is a leading ca…
The term "bigly"... ...might also be a marker of sarcasm here.
Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
131–140 of 258 posts
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#132Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#133I worry they're destroying native landscapes by replacing them with non-native tree plantations.
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#134Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're going to have to elaborate, I didn't understand your point at all. I look forward to watching you attempt to demonstrate that appropriation of native land, and free labor from slavery, aren't the pillars on which most wealth in the US was built. I'm sure it will be entertaining.
The shortest and simplest argument is that the South barely had the funds to prosecute the war while the North not only could fully fund their war efforts, they had access to extensive lines of credit from other nations. The South had to rely upon the largesse of European countries using it as a pawn. The North lost roughly one soldier for every African slave brought to the South and the least we could do is not impl…
Interesting argument. And what was the wealth of the North built on?
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does seem quite a bit, furiouspete talked about jobbing as a student in reforestation in Canada (his shrooms video) and apparently if you are quick you go through 4k a day per person a 12h shift. https://youtu.be/tzHw86XmNgc?t=440
Finland we specialized tool which you can get easily 200 trees planted in an hour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLtspCQPeqY
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US already has the cleanest of water and air. No need to do anything when you are leading the others bigly.
Right now it does. Major financial/political interests are seeking to gut the laws that got us the cleanest water and air in order to make more money for themselves.
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#138Regarding the trees - it is the rainy season in Ethiopia, should last another few months. The country is huge and while parts of it are very very dry, other parts are borderline jungle. There are some cloud rain forests, not sure if they have "proper" rain forests. Ethiopia actually as a country has a lot of water (though it does need to be carefully managed)
The government invests heavily in the country (as does China). In the span of a few years I saw huge changes in the infrastructure.
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#139Did anyone else find the 350M number implausible? They claim it happened in 12 hours. Unless they're talking about planting seeds, I find it hard to believe and take this story just as a political stunt. Ethiopia's population is 100M. Did 10% participate in this somehow, and each person plant 35 trees across the country? How would you even get that many trees to plant?
Re: Ethiopia Plants 350M Trees in One Day to Combat Drought and Climate Change
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
You realize that the European powers of 17th and 18th centuries "exploited" the Americas to include the U.S and yet here stands the U.S head and shoulders above these "exploiters".
America’s success was the direct result of ethnic cleansing of millions of Native Americans and the backbreaking labor of millions of slaves. The comparison is ridiculous. We were the exploiters.
Why do you think the slave-free north was much richer than the south, before the civil war?
If slavery makes a country rich, why isn't Africa rich?
Why wasn't Brazil, which imported ~4 million slaves (compare to ~200k for USA) significantly richer than the USA?
Native Americans had slaves:
> "An exhaustive search of some 725 late 18th/early 19th century ethnohistoric sources and 20th century ethnographic works indicates that predatory warfare, or preying on other groups for plunder and captives, was engaged in by virtually all Northwest Coast societies."
> "Source after source notes, either through specific instances or in general terms, and with almost monotonous iteration, that within this large area a prime motive for raiding was to gain captives for enslavement."
(From: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3773392?seq=1#page_scan_tab_con...)
Why weren't those people rich?
If you think slavery was instrumental to any rich nation getting rich, I suggest you read a lot more history, and look at who had the most slaves in history, and who has the most slaves today.