Earlier quoted context omitted.
In Minnesota for example, all one needs is another registered voter to vouch for them. My thoughts on this are old school. Like 1700's old school. A person's right to vote exists with or without documentation. A piece of paper, an entry in a ledger, or a row in a database has no bearing on whether that right exists, or should be exercised. In many of the states where I've lived (13 so far), all that was needed to vot…
Walking down the street and voting are not the same thing. ID's are common, the vast majority already have a passport or driver license. You need this much to even be employed so bringing it with you for an election is not an onerous requirement, it's actually completely reasonable. EDIT: It seems HN has rate-limiting for comments now.
The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
81–90 of 255 posts
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until we can authenticate voters, elections are invalid by default. How would you even prove that fraud is NOT happening, when many US states are essentially on the honor system? In California, I can register to vote from a Russian IP address without any form of ID or proof of residence. It's even easier than getting food stamps. Let me know if you want me to dig up proof for you.
In fact, California voter registration requires both identification and proof of residency. Please do provide the proof you're referring to.
> It is recommended homeless registrants list a shelter address as their voting address where they could receive mail. Alternatively, homeless registrants may denote a street corner or a park as their residence, in lieu of a traditional home address. The federal voter registration form and many state forms provide a space for this purpose.
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
How was that relevant to the conversation?
jdoliner's comment: voting should require ID stricter than library/corporation lutorm's comment: "Voting is a constitutional right" (implying that is isn't OK to require an ID) sneak's comment: "purchasing a firearm" (clearly a constitutional right, so it isn't OK to require ID to purchase one???) That is perfectly relevant. What sneak's comment does is point out that lutorm's argument implies that we can't have an I…
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
GP isn't arguing against detecting voter fraud. They're arguing against making the registration process harder in order to prevent (basically nonexistent) voter fraud. The reason people in the U.S. are worried about voter fraud is that one side of the political spectrum is pushing the narrative — without any real evidence — that voter fraud is rampant. We shouldn't make it more difficult to vote in order to fix a mad…
Until we can authenticate voters, elections are invalid by default. How would you even prove that fraud is NOT happening, when many US states are essentially on the honor system? In California, I can register to vote from a Russian IP address without any form of ID or proof of residence. It's even easier than getting food stamps. Let me know if you want me to dig up proof for you.
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#85I don't see any particular reason why the identification process for a corporation should be more stringent than a library card. What is astonishing to me is that both are meaningfully more stringent than voting. In Minnesota for example, all one needs is another registered voter to vouch for them. https://www.sos.state.mn.us/elections-voting/register-to-vot...
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not unusual among modern democracies for voters to provide proof of identity. We’re (and the UK?) the outliers in that, so no, I think it’s unrelated to authoritarianism. It’s got more to do with ensuring integrity of votes. India, Mexico, Argentina, Germany, Taiwan, Brazil, Iceland, Costa Rica, etc, require it. Among Americans all major demographics show majority support for voter ID reqs.
Authoritarianism always claims to be about ensuring the integrity of something or other. The question is always: is that the right goal, and is the proposal really the best way to accomplish that goal? Making election day a national holiday, for example, would do more to allow citizens to accurately express their voting preferences than any removal of non-citizen votes could ever do.
Neither is a bad idea.
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#87This comparison is stupid. Corporate registration is explicitly public information. Librarians are notorious for the fervency with which they protect the personal information of library patrons.
If information is collected then it can be stolen. Even if it is not permanently (or even temporarily) stored.
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#88Here's an example of what you need for a Delaware C-corp: https://www.incnow.com/delaware-corporation/ - Name of the corporation - Name and address of the Registered Agent of the corporation (usually a mail forwarding service) - Statement of the type of business that the corporation will engage in - Number of shares of authorized stock that the corporation will issue - Par value of each share - Name and signature of…
In Chicago the only requirements are a photo ID with address, or a letter with your name and address + an ID with your photo and name. Enough to comply with the anti-PATRIOTic act. But if that weren't the case, having your name/address/photo seems like a reasonable prerequisite for loaning you materials for free - the system would be very easy to abuse otherwise.
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not unusual among modern democracies for voters to provide proof of identity. We’re (and the UK?) the outliers in that, so no, I think it’s unrelated to authoritarianism. It’s got more to do with ensuring integrity of votes. India, Mexico, Argentina, Germany, Taiwan, Brazil, Iceland, Costa Rica, etc, require it. Among Americans all major demographics show majority support for voter ID reqs.
Australia doesn’t require voter ID either. Voter ID is a vehicle for voter suppression (and generally called for by the politically conservative).
None the less, we're down the list at no. 26 when it comes to voter integrity[1]. This is from 2014, so it's not encumbered by today's politics.
Ahead of us: Norway, Germany, Netherlands, Iceland, Czech Republic, Austria, South Korea, Slovenia, Israel, Cyprus, Lithuania, Australia, Rwanda, Japan, Chile, Italy, Grenada, Malta, Argentina, Georgia and Mongolia.
All except Australia req. Voter ID.
I (and everyone else) needs to present ID for cold medicine. I don't see this being burdensome.
[1]https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2014/11/study-ranks-...
Re: The Library Card Project: The Ease of Forming Anonymous Companies in the U.S.
#90Here are the instructions for incorporating in Delaware: https://corp.delaware.gov/howtoform/
A form an cover sheet are required. Plus, there is an obligation to submit an annual tax filing with lots of information.
Here is the online application for a library card in Orange County, CA: https://web.ocpl.org/n/LibraryCardApplication/
I’m sure things vary state by state, but I’ll leave that for others to comment.