Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right, we have to be critical of what we're doing because this is such an important challenge for humanity. This is why we're doing it: People who sign up for Wren usually were not previously considering offsetting their carbon footprint. In 1 month ~200 people have offset their footprint through Wren. We anticipate this number to grow exponentially, and think several million people offsetting their carbon foo…
> Project Drawdown has 99 more: https://www.drawdown.org/ You keep mentioning Project Drawdown in this thread. Why should people pay you 20% instead of just donating to Project Drawdown. Will you continue to take 20% when you reach those 'several million people' subscribing? I mean, at 5$ a month each that's 'several million' dollars a month for what, web hosting and 3 salaries? I see on LinkedIn you're listed as a s…
However overwhelmingly negative messages I believe can contribute to inaction through people moving straight from the denial phase to the "what's the point, we're all doomed" phase.
Just to pick the first of your points to rebut:
> Electric bikes (going to largely be powered by, fossil fuels)
1) in my country the grid uses 70+ renewable energy (mainly hydro), so EVs are extremely promising.
2) progress made on EVs will pay off in the future, when/if the grid becomes greener. How crap would it be to make big success at one end of the equation, e.g widespread deployment of nuclear to green the grid, and then find that all the vehicles had no way to use that clean power?
Of course it makes sense to develop technologies like electric bike, EVs generally.
Yet your comment is written as if it makes no sense. It conveys a strong sense of doom and pointlessness.
If your intention is just to spread doom, then perhaps keep it to yourself.
If it's to shock people into action then there are better ways to communicate.