Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess "fundamental" to me spoke of more horse vs donkey differences, not palomino vs dapple vs grey.
I think, and now biology is not at all my field, but I think the difference between human "races" is greater than just exterior colouring. See for example the Sickle-cell disease situation. That's maybe like horse breeds; this seems a good overview of health differences by breed, https://thehorse.com/111370/genetic-disorders-breed-by-breed... . Human races are certainly more than just skin colour, if your race can af…
No.
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-resh...
> Thus, there is no evidence that the groups we commonly call “races” have distinct, unifying genetic identities.
> Ultimately, there is so much ambiguity between the races, and so much variation within them, that two people of European descent may be more genetically similar to an Asian person than they are to each other
> In the biological and social sciences, the consensus is clear: race is a social construct, not a biological attribute
etc.etc.etc.