I don't understand, maybe due to a language difference. Does 100% fruit juice mean the store bought 100% fruit guice (the premium brands?) or literally freshly squeezed orange, immediately drank? Wouldn't also eating fresh fruits be linked?
Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
31–40 of 109 posts
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#32I don't understand, maybe due to a language difference. Does 100% fruit juice mean the store bought 100% fruit guice (the premium brands?) or literally freshly squeezed orange, immediately drank? Wouldn't also eating fresh fruits be linked?
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#33Does anyone know the answer to this question? If I am going to drink a soda, which soda am I better off drinking? Coke or Diet Coke/Coke Zero? I know that neither option is good for me, but which would be comparatively better or is the science still out on that?
This study seems to very clearly indicate Diet Coke/Coke Zero is much healthier than Coke. There are tons of studies like this that concretely show how bad sugar is for you, while most studies show that artificial sweeteners have no (or minimal relative to sugar) adverse health effects.
That matches my one-person anecdotal observations, but perhaps that isn't much to go by. Find what works for you. I had much better luck with health and personal fitness by that vs. getting overly worried about what other people say works.
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#34Sorry Warburg Effect on wikipedia if anyone is curious.
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#35I don't understand, maybe due to a language difference. Does 100% fruit juice mean the store bought 100% fruit guice (the premium brands?) or literally freshly squeezed orange, immediately drank? Wouldn't also eating fresh fruits be linked?
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#36This is the kind of study you would have thought would have been done decades ago. Super relevant. I wonder why it’s taken so long.
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aside from naturally occurring micronutrients, fruit juice isn't that different from soda. I'm not a chemist, but I think it's largely just different ratios of sucrose/fructose/glucose.
Does the fiber in the fruit negate the cancer risks? If not, would it be logical to say fruit is now linked to cancer?
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#38Now that's surprising. I would have guessed artificial sweeteners would have had more cancerous effects than "natural" sugars, but I guess that's just a logical fallicy where I assume lab synthesized chemicals are automatically worse for your body than plant synthesized chemicals.
Artificially sweetened drinks are extremely bad. Refer to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30802187
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#39I don't understand, maybe due to a language difference. Does 100% fruit juice mean the store bought 100% fruit guice (the premium brands?) or literally freshly squeezed orange, immediately drank? Wouldn't also eating fresh fruits be linked?
Out of curiosity what do you see as the difference? Is it just how long the juice sat there? Or are you suggesting they add something to (not-from-concentrate) "100% fruit juice" that isn't listed in the ingredients?
Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort
#40I don't understand, maybe due to a language difference. Does 100% fruit juice mean the store bought 100% fruit guice (the premium brands?) or literally freshly squeezed orange, immediately drank? Wouldn't also eating fresh fruits be linked?
It's very difficult to eat 5 oranges in one go.
It's very easy to drink the same 5 oranges as a fresh squeezed drink.
So it's basically a question of quantity, eating it makes you full very quickly, unlike drinking it.