> Google needs to stick to being a solid search engine instead of trying to be gate keepers While I agree with the sentiment, I feel like this ship sailed years ago - it's like saying "Amazon should stick to being an ecommerce platform". What's more, Google was never in the business of "being a solid search engine". Google is and always has been in the business of selling access to users' eyeballs. AMP - as much as I…
> What's more, Google was never in the business of "being a solid search engine". Google is and always has been in the business of selling access to users' eyeballs. That's not how they became the darling of the tech scene though. http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html > Currently, the predominant business model for commercial search engines is advertising. The goals of the advertising business model do not…
Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
31–40 of 215 posts
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#32My current business is heavily Google reliant, and Google been proving to be a very poor business partner:
* Keeps punishing my site both in organic rank and AdWords rank (thus price) for not being mobile, despite my site being intended to be viewed by engineers with big screens.
* They remove frequently whatever features they had to avoid wasting money, the one that offended me the most is that I can't anymore advertise on mobile websites unless I also allow apps too, and apps are purely fraudulent clicks, babies don't buy industrial parts...
* Google refuses to take care of fraud, I've visited the top sources of clicks on my display campaigns and there was comments for example on store pages explicitly complaining it was pure fraud, and Google does nothing about it (example: one source of clicks was a flashlight app on Android that opens ads whenever the user turns the flashlight on, clicking the ad is only way to turn it off again)
* Google often randomly stop my ads and search because bogus reasons, requiring me to call them to fix it.
* They removed from AdWords interface the max click price when the campaign is in automatic mode, in the past this was very useful to find out if their AI was bugged (like one time it insisted on setting max cpm to 0.01 despite average cost until that day being 1.20...) or oberpricing me (charging ludicrous prices per click)
Their product (ad publishing, not search) is crap, but they have literal Monopoly, all other ads publishers I tried gave me almost zero clicks...
Only thing I don't tried yet is more traditional ads, but I don't have money for that (for example TV ads)
I honestly don't know why so many governments with strong antimonopoly laws tolerate Google shenanigans.
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#33There's an easier way - don't implement AMP.
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you block their IP? Google has hundreds of numbers and AFAIK they don’t even publish all of them.
As others mentioned, you can block their user-agent. That will stop most crawling. They have some bots that use browser agents to see if you serve different content to non-google bots. To block those, you can feed their IP's to haproxy or iptables ipset. fetch_google() { for line in $(dig +short txt _cloud-netblocks.googleusercontent.com | tr " " "\n" | grep include | cut -f 2 -d :) do dig +short txt "${line}" done |…
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#35Just to be clear, there is a mistake in this post. Adding a noindex tag will cause google to not display the page in their search results. They will still crawl ( they have to), in order to see that directive. Also, keep in mind that google has recently changed the way they deal with robots.txt. So they only way to do what the author is suggesting is to add the noindex meta tag and let them crawl. Once they are remov…
I've found that google will still include the page in their search index if it's been discovered by means other than crawling the resource itself (e.g. it's linked from other pages). The search result will simply not include any content from the page, since they've presumably not crawled the page.
Of course they still have it indexed in their own systems .... would you trust Google not to.
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#36> Google needs to stick to being a solid search engine instead of trying to be gate keepers While I agree with the sentiment, I feel like this ship sailed years ago - it's like saying "Amazon should stick to being an ecommerce platform". What's more, Google was never in the business of "being a solid search engine". Google is and always has been in the business of selling access to users' eyeballs. AMP - as much as I…
As a French I’m pretty glad in retrospect that my ancestors under Napoleon reign and the Bourbon restoration didn’t go like “I really think democracy would have been a nice feature but I feel like this ship sailed”
Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#37Re: Dear Google, I'm Blocking You from My Website
#38I am currently struggling with Google and been even considering just straight up creating a Brazilian "Yandex/Baidu" clone or something somehow. My current business is heavily Google reliant, and Google been proving to be a very poor business partner: * Keeps punishing my site both in organic rank and AdWords rank (thus price) for not being mobile, despite my site being intended to be viewed by engineers with big scr…
To build an anti-monopoly case you would have to do more than show that Google was the only good ad vendor. Are they the only ones that can give you clicks because they are smarter and better at their jobs than every other ad vendor, or are they the only ones that can give you clicks because of underhanded market tactics? If I was the best shoemaker in town, to the point where buying shoes from anybody else was a waste of time, that wouldn't be illegal. You'd have to show I was doing more to stop competition.