About time. Traveling is killing the planet. One of major causes of climate change. We need to take it seriously. I'm glad France is willing to take a bold and brave step to support the environment.
Business travel is killing our planet. All the family vacations in the world can't compete with giant companies constantly shuttling thousands of employees all around the globe to attend meetings and conferences.
France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
261–270 of 578 posts
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#262I am actually surprised that short-distance flights aren't taxed more in Western Europe. The train infrastructure in France is world class and can get you from Paris (North-Central part of the country) to Marseille (Southeast), a distance of about 500 miles, in 3 hours. For Americans, this would be roughly equivalent to go from Boston to Washington D.C. (a trip that takes 7-10+ hours)
At least in Germany, taking the train is insanely expensive.
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible" ~ Stanisław Jerzy Lec Sure, you won't be able to make a measurable impact by yourself. However your mindset quickly leads to a tragedy of the commons type response that leaves us all in trouble. We should all take a more proactive approach to this in both our private life and in our professional work.
tragedy of the commons is solved by regulation, not by hoping that individuals or corporations will discipline themselves
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#264I am actually surprised that short-distance flights aren't taxed more in Western Europe. The train infrastructure in France is world class and can get you from Paris (North-Central part of the country) to Marseille (Southeast), a distance of about 500 miles, in 3 hours. For Americans, this would be roughly equivalent to go from Boston to Washington D.C. (a trip that takes 7-10+ hours)
It does seem the like tax is backwards. They barely tax the flights that could be replaced by rail, but have higher taxes on the ones that can't.
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are correct. There are people working on this, but the best estimates I've seen are that hybrid-electric airliners are ~30-40 years from commercialization and fully electric simply isn't feasible without a fundamental breakthrough in the battery energy-density space.
Even hybrids only make sense to me in the context of aircraft having the ability to taxi using electric motors, only starting their engines at the holding point (turbine engines burn a significant amount of fuel even at idle). I believe Airbus have a patent on this idea. Otherwise turbine engines are run close to their designed maximum continuous thrust for the majority of a flight. It's not like a car where they onl…
One specific area that I recall being investigated is the ability to decouple power and thrust. That is, convert some of the power generated by the existing turbines into electricity and use that to drive an electric fan in (a) non-traditional location(s). This can have complex aerodynamic interactions that I don't really understand in detail, but the take-away is that it can reduce drag and thus overall energy required for a given flight.
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible" ~ Stanisław Jerzy Lec Sure, you won't be able to make a measurable impact by yourself. However your mindset quickly leads to a tragedy of the commons type response that leaves us all in trouble. We should all take a more proactive approach to this in both our private life and in our professional work.
tragedy of the commons is solved by regulation, not by hoping that individuals or corporations will discipline themselves
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yawn There are much worse polluters, sure, travel is a contribution to greenhouse gasses, but I guess fuck people for wanting to take a plane somewhere Though the tax is small, so this seems more like a money grab than anything else
If they use the money for improving or subsidizing train service, then that's a good thing because it's moving more travel to trains, which are far more ecological. If you really have a problem paying a paltry 1.5 Euros for a flight, then maybe you should be saving your money instead of taking trips.
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
> When was the last time you took a train from Paris to New York? Right after I sold my beachfront house in Arizona.
Surely for the joke to work you'd have to suggest that sea levels were much lower, not higher. Eg: 'When I sold my Manhattan mountain lodge.'
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#269The UK already taxes flights in a similar way. Whilst this does feel like progress, it would be much better to tax the fuel instead of the passengers. Virtually all other fuel is taxed, so it's strange that jet fuel is exempt. The problem with taxing passengers instead of fuel include: - it doesn't encourage improving the efficiency of planes - airlines can't fill their planes with really cheap seats, and empty seats…
It's illegal to tax fuel for international flights. Domestic fuel is already taxed but the Chicago Convention in 1944 set the ground rules for the ICAO and international air travel.
Re: France to tax flights from its airports, airline shares fall
#270I am actually surprised that short-distance flights aren't taxed more in Western Europe. The train infrastructure in France is world class and can get you from Paris (North-Central part of the country) to Marseille (Southeast), a distance of about 500 miles, in 3 hours. For Americans, this would be roughly equivalent to go from Boston to Washington D.C. (a trip that takes 7-10+ hours)