Live data from Hacker News

YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

boingboing.net

401–410 of 449 posts

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#401
post #342
post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm happy for you that you speak a language google happens to have support in, and that you have the time to besides creating and uploading content, to monitor it is not censored at a later, random, date by google. And that you were able to provide the US based documentation they required and that your videos content happened to not be in the blacklist of any nation state. /s (I guess)

YouTube is a private company. They are under no obligation to provide support in 5,000 different languages. Or to host your videos at all. This post reeks of entitlement.

At what stage does a private company need to become a public service? There's examples of this happening throughout the ages where private companies like fire fighters, telephone, etc went from being private to public, and sometimes back to private.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#402
post #365
post #334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YouTube used to be that place.... I remember it, I want that YouTube Back... YouTube did not become popular with "mainstream stuff" if I wanted "mainstream stuff" I would still be a cable TV Subscriber YouTube promoting only "mainstream stuff" like CBS, and CNN will kill YouTube

YouTube got popular with mainstream TV shows and movies. Then after it won all the market share with that content, Google bought it and turned it legit.

Yeah that's utterly wrong, YouTube got popular because it was the best platform to upload any video and find and watch any video. Then music got big on youtube. Right now they are trying to go into movies, not sure how it will work out for them.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're not banning knives though, are we? Guns are different, and they're banned for the same reasons that, say, carrying around a bioweapon is banned. - Their primary purpose is to inflict harm. - The harm caused is potentially / easily lethal. - Their existence escalates nearly all situations. - They're dangerous items that can very easily cause accidental harm.

"we"? In the UK you are not allowed to carry a knife with you, unless you just bought one and are bringing to home or are a certified chief who needs one for work, or are going camping.

Hmm, how is it actually regulated? So, e.g. if I am going to my friends and carrying a bottle of wine altogether with pocket knife bundled with a corkscrew to be sure I will be able to open it, then I am in a grey zone or even illegal?

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#404
post #399
post #334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YouTube used to be that place.... I remember it, I want that YouTube Back... YouTube did not become popular with "mainstream stuff" if I wanted "mainstream stuff" I would still be a cable TV Subscriber YouTube promoting only "mainstream stuff" like CBS, and CNN will kill YouTube

> CNN will kill youtube Given CNN'S dwindling ratings I sincerely doubt that. If anything youtube needs to rescue them.

No CNN should collapse

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#405

What's next, cracking and reverse-engineering? Debugging? (Anti-authoritarian) programming ? As usual, Stallman tends to be quite prescient: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html (perhaps more like "right to watch" in this context.)

I always think he’s mostly right, but a little too uncompromising, but then everything he says comes true. I don’t know how he predicted so far ahead at the time, it’s humbling. As a software author working at startups, am I part of the problem? I don’t understand how to make a good living without locking down the code to some extent, with few exceptions (it’s hard to found red hat)

The free software movement is really a radical concept. It encourages us to go beyond capitalism and making a buck to more fundamental aspects of humanity.

I’m afraid we are all part of the problem, but we can also be part of a solution, particularly if we work collectively.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#406

This is what happens when you have no real public space on the Internet. Corporations will hide under the guise of private property. We really need to redefine the public space on the Internet.

It ceased to be a public place long ago. - We fucked it up, when we wanted it all for free and shoved all our data up Google/Facebook/Apple/Amazon/Whatever's asses. When financial interest and gains are high enough, how do you want to stop it? Opensource all the infrastructure, let it be owned by some supranational, "communist" organization? How would you guarantee that this be any better than those quasi monopolies?

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#407

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're not banning knives though, are we? Guns are different, and they're banned for the same reasons that, say, carrying around a bioweapon is banned. - Their primary purpose is to inflict harm. - The harm caused is potentially / easily lethal. - Their existence escalates nearly all situations. - They're dangerous items that can very easily cause accidental harm.

"we"? In the UK you are not allowed to carry a knife with you, unless you just bought one and are bringing to home or are a certified chief who needs one for work, or are going camping.

Many states in the USA are similar once you get above a certain blade length to allow for common pocket knives. Then again the same rules will get you in trouble for having a baseball bat and don't seem to have a good reason.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#408

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're not banning knives though, are we? Guns are different, and they're banned for the same reasons that, say, carrying around a bioweapon is banned. - Their primary purpose is to inflict harm. - The harm caused is potentially / easily lethal. - Their existence escalates nearly all situations. - They're dangerous items that can very easily cause accidental harm.

"we"? In the UK you are not allowed to carry a knife with you, unless you just bought one and are bringing to home or are a certified chief who needs one for work, or are going camping.

Actually, in the UK you are not legally allowed to carry a hard fruit such as for example a squash or miniature pumpkin in a plastic carry bag if you end up using it for self defence when attacked.

Yes, that's right, in UK carrying in public any object that can be or is used as a weapon (including defensively) is considered a crime. This is normally applied to knives, but if the letter of the law was to be adhered to someone who did defend themselves against an attack with a small pumpkin could be arrested for the possession of the said pumpkin... This is the madness of UK law.

I remember few years ago a situation where a dog attacked a small child and wouldn't let go, someone ran home, grabbed a kitchen knife, killed the dog and saved the child. When the police arrived they had to arrest the person who saved the child life because of the knife... Thankfully the person didn't end up being charged as no witness would testify that that person has indeed used a knife as a weapon.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#409
post #76

I've noticed quite a few free software enthusiast posting their content to LBRY[1]. Doesn't seem like a perfect solution for every type of video getting messed up by YouTube lately, but I think infosec could find a good home there. [1] https://lbry.com/what

Absolutely not. Its more "decentralized crypto blockchain" nonsense. Nope, nope, and just nope.

LBRY would be perfect without blockchain. As someone that talks about blockchain since 2016, I see no reason why they need a slow database

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#410
post #119

Now might be a good opportunity for Pornhub to offer a reskinned version of their site. They already have the infrastructure and people do host non-porn related content there.

Fantastic idea, and honestly Pornhub's values are a good match. They're used to hosting explicit, controversial content, resisting even copyright takedowns (unfortunately), yet they do a good job of keeping outright atrocities off the platform (e.g. snuff films, child porn etc.) But how would they make money off it? Infosec expats from YouTube are probably the most likely population to use ad-block of anyone!

Political extremists

Potentially dangerous science experiments

Post reply on HN