Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to list some examples? (Not that I disagree)
1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.
Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
61–70 of 107 posts
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#62Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#63Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#64I think equating Wave to a 'big' risk is a bit much, financially there was no risk. All they lost was face. Also Chrome and Android are not successes, Google Adwords is a success, MS Office is a success, MS Windows is a success. The key ingredient to a success for a company is some MONEY. Anything else is just showing off. I'm still very disappointed with the follow through on Wave and Buzz, a bit of PR and a few man…
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
ycombinator?
Y Combinator and FriendFeed don't count, naturally. Somehow, they don't go in the "job" category the same way other jobs do.
In light of YC's recent tie-up with Facebook, it's good to see that there might very well be a voice of caution within the organization.
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to list some examples? (Not that I disagree)
1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.
Kinect was on the top of my list. When I used Kinect, it seemed quite magical (and I'm jaded enough that few pieces of tech makes me go that way). I really suspect a Kinect from Apple would have been handled differently.
Nearly all of Microsoft's own promotional stuff is extraordinarily bad, especially in comparison to Apple.
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#68BTW, when is Google going to allow third party developers to enhance its core search results via a search API? Such an API would allow third party developers to add Wolfram Alpha like features among other things right into the core Google search.
I think they used to do this - I could swear that I used to have a third-party plugin that I "installed" on my Google account that would show me JavaDocs whenever I Googled a Java class name. It hasn't shown up in about 3 years, though, and I haven't found any trace of it in the code I work with (which should be right around that area of the page...), so maybe it was discontinued.
http://code.google.com/apis/websearch/
(In favor of "custom search" - but that only works for your own website)
Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome
#69I think equating Wave to a 'big' risk is a bit much, financially there was no risk. All they lost was face. Also Chrome and Android are not successes, Google Adwords is a success, MS Office is a success, MS Windows is a success. The key ingredient to a success for a company is some MONEY. Anything else is just showing off. I'm still very disappointed with the follow through on Wave and Buzz, a bit of PR and a few man…
I was under the impression that Android was profitable by itself- though I'm not sure where the money is coming from. Certification/contract work with manufacturers?