Live data from Hacker News

Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

paulbuchheit.blogspot.com

61–70 of 107 posts

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#61
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to list some examples? (Not that I disagree)

1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.

The media did go "gaga" over those, even despite the fact that 99.99% of people will never see a Surface.

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#63
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to list some examples? (Not that I disagree)

1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.

How was Surface a success where Wave wasn't?

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#64

I think equating Wave to a 'big' risk is a bit much, financially there was no risk. All they lost was face. Also Chrome and Android are not successes, Google Adwords is a success, MS Office is a success, MS Windows is a success. The key ingredient to a success for a company is some MONEY. Anything else is just showing off. I'm still very disappointed with the follow through on Wave and Buzz, a bit of PR and a few man…

The funny thing about Google Buzz is it's so simple that it can't die. It can always be integrated into any other Google service. For example, you can view geo-tagged Buzz messages in Maps for Android.

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#65
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ycombinator?

Y Combinator and FriendFeed don't count, naturally. Somehow, they don't go in the "job" category the same way other jobs do.

This implicitly means Facebook does count. You don't have to answer this one.

In light of YC's recent tie-up with Facebook, it's good to see that there might very well be a voice of caution within the organization.

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#66
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to list some examples? (Not that I disagree)

1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.

Kinect was on the top of my list. When I used Kinect, it seemed quite magical (and I'm jaded enough that few pieces of tech makes me go that way). I really suspect a Kinect from Apple would have been handled differently.

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#67
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Project Natal/Kinect 2. Surface Table Both are good innovations, on which media would go over gaga, had they come from Apple/Google.

Kinect was on the top of my list. When I used Kinect, it seemed quite magical (and I'm jaded enough that few pieces of tech makes me go that way). I really suspect a Kinect from Apple would have been handled differently.

You're probably right. But you've got to admit that Apple itself makes its products seem much more magical than Microsoft does. They do such a good job that it's really easy for the media to pick it up and run with it.

Nearly all of Microsoft's own promotional stuff is extraordinarily bad, especially in comparison to Apple.

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#68
post #3

BTW, when is Google going to allow third party developers to enhance its core search results via a search API? Such an API would allow third party developers to add Wolfram Alpha like features among other things right into the core Google search.

I think they used to do this - I could swear that I used to have a third-party plugin that I "installed" on my Google account that would show me JavaDocs whenever I Googled a Java class name. It hasn't shown up in about 3 years, though, and I haven't found any trace of it in the code I work with (which should be right around that area of the page...), so maybe it was discontinued.

Yes, the web search api has been Deprecated.

http://code.google.com/apis/websearch/

(In favor of "custom search" - but that only works for your own website)

Re: Paul Buchheit: Four Reasons Google is still Awesome

#69

I think equating Wave to a 'big' risk is a bit much, financially there was no risk. All they lost was face. Also Chrome and Android are not successes, Google Adwords is a success, MS Office is a success, MS Windows is a success. The key ingredient to a success for a company is some MONEY. Anything else is just showing off. I'm still very disappointed with the follow through on Wave and Buzz, a bit of PR and a few man…

I was under the impression that Android was profitable by itself- though I'm not sure where the money is coming from. Certification/contract work with manufacturers?

Mobile ads.
Post reply on HN