Libra is targeted at developing countries
31–40 of 41 posts
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anybody who uses VISA or PayPal but then wouldn't use Libra because of "privacy concerns" probably doesn't realize how invasive these other companies are. Libra will not require a Facebook account and will supposedly not be tied to a Facebook account, so the danger should be about the same.
If this product brings us from a world of venmo, paypal, facebook payments, wechat etc to one where I can use any of their clients to send money to any of the other clients, I consider it a huge win. It's so silly that my friends and I have to agree on the same money app to send money to each other. Imagine if I had to convince every person to use firefox before I could send them a url, or if they needed hotmail and…
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
If this product brings us from a world of venmo, paypal, facebook payments, wechat etc to one where I can use any of their clients to send money to any of the other clients, I consider it a huge win. It's so silly that my friends and I have to agree on the same money app to send money to each other. Imagine if I had to convince every person to use firefox before I could send them a url, or if they needed hotmail and…
It takes 5 minutes per life to sign up for a zelle /venmo/WeChat account , plus one minute per device.
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
If this product brings us from a world of venmo, paypal, facebook payments, wechat etc to one where I can use any of their clients to send money to any of the other clients, I consider it a huge win. It's so silly that my friends and I have to agree on the same money app to send money to each other. Imagine if I had to convince every person to use firefox before I could send them a url, or if they needed hotmail and…
What's wrong with cash?
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anybody who uses VISA or PayPal but then wouldn't use Libra because of "privacy concerns" probably doesn't realize how invasive these other companies are. Libra will not require a Facebook account and will supposedly not be tied to a Facebook account, so the danger should be about the same.
Frankly, I find the entire fintech/payment processor/credit environment to be at times little more than a parasite that I'd like to see go away. That won't happen though. Capital needs to flow as freely as possible; and the current players at least make that work. Libra, however, has no substantive purpose in the long run other than to finally tap into the rent-seeking upper layers of the financial system. It seems t…
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#36Unified Payment Interface (UPI) in India is a highly scalable (800million transactions per month) mobile payment method with 160+ banks participating with numerous mobile apps (example: Bhim, PhonePe) that is free of charge for merchant payments and up to 30 person to person payments per month. Subsequent P2P transactions are charged at flat ₹2.5 for Please see statistics published by various agencies: NPCI - Nationa…
Is it "free" from a customers's perspective, or from a merchant's perspective? From a customer's perspective, credit cards are also "free". However, from a merchant's perspective, the cost is 2-3% plus a constant hassle with prospective fraud.
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#37Most people in developing countries don’t have access to USD, online transactions or crypto (because of the knowledge barrier).
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
If this product brings us from a world of venmo, paypal, facebook payments, wechat etc to one where I can use any of their clients to send money to any of the other clients, I consider it a huge win. It's so silly that my friends and I have to agree on the same money app to send money to each other. Imagine if I had to convince every person to use firefox before I could send them a url, or if they needed hotmail and…
What's wrong with cash?
plus, facebook payments are already so fast, i can take the money out from an atm one minute after the transfer is initiated.
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#39Unified Payment Interface (UPI) in India is a highly scalable (800million transactions per month) mobile payment method with 160+ banks participating with numerous mobile apps (example: Bhim, PhonePe) that is free of charge for merchant payments and up to 30 person to person payments per month. Subsequent P2P transactions are charged at flat ₹2.5 for Please see statistics published by various agencies: NPCI - Nationa…
Traditional wire transfer certainly cannot, since the fees alone are many times larger than $1 USD.
Re: Libra is targeted at developing countries
#40Unified Payment Interface (UPI) in India is a highly scalable (800million transactions per month) mobile payment method with 160+ banks participating with numerous mobile apps (example: Bhim, PhonePe) that is free of charge for merchant payments and up to 30 person to person payments per month. Subsequent P2P transactions are charged at flat ₹2.5 for Please see statistics published by various agencies: NPCI - Nationa…
I would like to send my friend in India $1 USD. Does Unified Payment Interface make this possible? Traditional wire transfer certainly cannot, since the fees alone are many times larger than $1 USD.
The international small amount transfer use-case is extremely rare and unlikely to take-off because of Libra.
In any case, you seem to be assuming Libra won't charge forex fees for converting between Libra and fiat currency. They have not said so. It is very likely they will charge.
I don't see any reason why the banks involved in exchanging Libra with fiat currency to behave any differently than they do today. They will play with the buy/sell rates to make money on both sides of the trade.