Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
1–10 of 62 posts
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#2Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#3See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20259012
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#4I remember a time when politics was not discussed in polite company.
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#5Another example of the politicisation of everything.... I remember a time when politics was not discussed in polite company.
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#6Another example of the politicisation of everything.... I remember a time when politics was not discussed in polite company.
I'm not sure which way you're going with that comment. Ravelry seems to be saying "we are polite company, keep your politics off our knitting site, thx". If anything, it's de-politicisation.
If anything this is escalating the problem by silencing the opposition and further entrenching both sides.
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure which way you're going with that comment. Ravelry seems to be saying "we are polite company, keep your politics off our knitting site, thx". If anything, it's de-politicisation.
Did I miss something? The linked article looks to me to say that Pro-Trump views are not allowed to be expressed. Not that politics has no place in their community. If anything this is escalating the problem by silencing the opposition and further entrenching both sides.
Their policy is at https://www.ravelry.com/content/no-trump .
Their argument is "We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy. Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy."
So by "both sides" it seems like you mean the one side in favor of white supremacy, and the other side not in favor of white supremacy?
Why should a knitting site allow support for open white supremacy?
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did I miss something? The linked article looks to me to say that Pro-Trump views are not allowed to be expressed. Not that politics has no place in their community. If anything this is escalating the problem by silencing the opposition and further entrenching both sides.
Escalating what problem? Their policy is at https://www.ravelry.com/content/no-trump . Their argument is "We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy. Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy." So by "both sides" it seems like you mean the one side in favor of white supremacy, and the other side not in favor of white supremacy…
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#9Another example of the politicisation of everything.... I remember a time when politics was not discussed in polite company.
Isn't this policy inherently conservative, in that it ignores any desire for political change?
Does it mean that the abolitionists and suffragettes were not polite? Because they sometimes were not. It's part of how they got change.
Re: Ravelry, a Popular Knitting Site, Bans Pro-Trump Content
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did I miss something? The linked article looks to me to say that Pro-Trump views are not allowed to be expressed. Not that politics has no place in their community. If anything this is escalating the problem by silencing the opposition and further entrenching both sides.
Escalating what problem? Their policy is at https://www.ravelry.com/content/no-trump . Their argument is "We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy. Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy." So by "both sides" it seems like you mean the one side in favor of white supremacy, and the other side not in favor of white supremacy…
It really hurts any credibility someone may have granted you in a conversation when you ascribe to one side of a discussion a world view that is condemned by the vast majority of that side.