Wow, marketing spam from a competitor. We send confidential docs regularly to users, who need access to those docs for perhaps 1 week at most. No one wants / needs to keep these around, but no one goes through their email carefully to delete these items. If that users email was hacked -> they have a big problem. If we can mark the items for a 3 week retention and then expire those items for them, that great - and thi…
There's no need to call Protonmail idiots in order to put across your views on the subject, keep it civil. Plus, it makes your argument look weak if you have to resort to name-calling.
"Gmail confidential mode is little more than a marketing strategy."
FALSE - This type of approach has real and direct security benefits. The fact that proton can't see understand that makes them idiots.
"Gmail’s confidential mode is little more than a marketing trick designed to pacify users concerned about privacy."
FALSE - Many business users using google are less concerned about privacy than they are about SECURITY. In the business context, most privacy is already given up, your employer can go through your emails. They can vault them up, do e-discovery on them etc etc. These aren't folks fighting off nation states. These are folks who someone in the office WILL click the bogus link and have their account taken over - and the business wants to reduce the blast radius.
Saying this is a marketing "trick" is silly and the fact that proton can't see that makes them idiots.