I saw a study recently, unfortunately I can't locate it now. It discussed the possibility of there having been past civilizations on Earth, hundreds of millions or even billions of years ago. The conclusion was that this can't be entirely ruled out. It noted how few actual fossil remains we have for what we know of dinosaurs, and that there's a lot of space left in those gaps for all the evidence to have been destroy…
I am not a geologist, but it seems improbable for a technical civilization (like our current one) to not leave a global geological mark. For example, our use of fossil fuels changed global carbon isotope composition: our atmosphere now has less portion of C13, because photosynthesis favors the lighter C12 atoms, and all our fossil fuels ultimately derives from photosynthesis.[1] The changed isotope ratio will be dete…
Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
281–290 of 391 posts
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#282How common are "life-friendly" planets (Let's say: on a ratio of Life-Friendly Planet:Non Life-Friendly Planet)? And is there any way to check if life-friendly planets contain life without actually going there?
There are plans for doing spectrography on the atmospheres of these planets. This would allow us to get a pretty good picture of the chemical composition. Biological life as we know it should leave a different footprint than a lifeless planet but in the end we can only extrapolate what we already know about life.
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And if we are going to build an underground colony....then why not start with one here on Earth? Because if an asteroid hits Earth or if the world superpowers decide to go full nuclear, the underground colony in Mars will survive (unless superpowers decide to nuke that from here as well...)
I'd argue that a colony at the bottom of our own ocean would survive literally any event of any magnitude, maybe except for a direct asteroid strike. In terms of survivability of the human race, that's a better project to start with - and of course then move on to other planets, but underwater/underground colonies would give us lots of insights into living in such environments permanently.
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#284Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#285Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had high hopes, but TBP is a terrible novel. It certainly has some fascinating ideas, but just as many ludicrous ones that are equally central to the plot. Not to mention Liu is absolutely terrible at anything relating to characters: dialogue, character development, etc.
Reading that someone else had this opinion of TBP is so valididating. The book receives much hype but the characters are weak and forgettable.
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#286And to think that there is likely an Easy Mode system out there. A habitable planet on the low end of the mass spectrum needed for a stable atmosphere with other habitable planets in-system. And all that close to another star with habitable planets, possibly in the sub-lightyear range. Basically everything ripe for a spacefaring civilization to grow without too much trouble and with plenty of motivation. The Earth is…
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#287I saw a study recently, unfortunately I can't locate it now. It discussed the possibility of there having been past civilizations on Earth, hundreds of millions or even billions of years ago. The conclusion was that this can't be entirely ruled out. It noted how few actual fossil remains we have for what we know of dinosaurs, and that there's a lot of space left in those gaps for all the evidence to have been destroy…
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not the density of the star but the density of stars. Dense clusters like those found in the center of our galaxy create a lot of secondary effects like bigger stars pulling matter away from smaller stars (creating lots of background radiation and matter floating around) and then stars plow through those interstellar clouds, creating deadly bursts capable of cooking entire planets, stripping away their atmospher…
I'm talking about the local solar density, not an individual star's density. Obviously that has little effect on the habitable zone of a planet. My question was about the ability of a system's star's own radiation to ward off extra-solar radiation and what kind of limitations we are aware of.
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or perhaps that’s ultra-hard mode. Multiple fantastically different independent intelligent species evolving on planets within shooting range of each other with basic industrial technology. If you’ve ever played civilization, it is a helluva lot harder to get started in Europe than in North America.
You consider 12 light years to be within shooting range? Good luck with that.
Re: Two potentially life-friendly planets found orbiting a nearby star
#290"Habitable" in also relative to our Earthly form of life. There may be other architectures that prefer different temperatures and pressures, perhaps.
Also, from 12 ly away, I'm sure that Sol would appear to have at least 3 habitable planets (Venus, Earth, Mars).
Habitability isn't a Boolean. It's hugely dependent on history, context, and resources.
The more Boolean distinction doesn't have a name - but if it did, it would be something like Stable Evolutionary Potential.
Mars and Venus both fail on that. The moons fail on it now, but may pass when the Sun turns into a red giant.
The Earth has offered it for long time, with some uncertainty about the near future.
There's no reliable way to distinguish SEP at a distance. But noting that a star has planets in its habitable zone and making some estimate of how many planets in stable systems are likely to offer SEP is a decent start.