Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except mobile browsers, arguably the most critical place where you need blocking to get any kind of reasonably decent experience (load times, viewable area, battery life, etc.). Extensions like uBlock target people who don't want to bother with editing hosts files and keeping them updated.
Mobile chrome did not support ad blocking extensions last time I checked
Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
31–40 of 256 posts
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except mobile browsers, arguably the most critical place where you need blocking to get any kind of reasonably decent experience (load times, viewable area, battery life, etc.). Extensions like uBlock target people who don't want to bother with editing hosts files and keeping them updated.
Mobile chrome did not support ad blocking extensions last time I checked
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#33So if I'm going to switch browsers because of privacy/advertising concerns, it's not going to be Opera.
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mobile chrome did not support ad blocking extensions last time I checked
A chromium fork named Kiwi supports extensions on Android! Thanks to this I can play youtube music in the background and have the fastest possible browser on Android. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kiwibrowse...
https://github.com/kiwibrowser/android/issues/30
There's NewPipe at F-Droid for youtube music in the background and so much more.
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#35I feel like things would be easier if Firefox could be embeded in another browser just like chromium can. Let Google cripple their browser for themselves, and Mozilla provide the good and strong de facto browser engine.
I haven't seen this talked about here but... last I checked Mozilla was in majority funded by Google royalties. What's their plan of aligning their income with essentially directly attacking their funding source?
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#36Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except mobile browsers, arguably the most critical place where you need blocking to get any kind of reasonably decent experience (load times, viewable area, battery life, etc.). Extensions like uBlock target people who don't want to bother with editing hosts files and keeping them updated.
I use such a host file on my android. There's even apps to manage them. Needs a rooted device though. That has the added benefit of removing ads in all apps, because when they can't be loaded, generally not even the empty widget shows.
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I won't worry about that. I'm guessing this effectively creates a fork of Chromium that does not have the anti-ad blocker changes in question, which Opera/Brave/Edge will use instead of the main one. On that note, are people switching over to Firefox already?
> On that note, are people switching over to Firefox already? Not sure why power users ever left Firefox as their default browser when surveillance tech came along. I sure didn't. Firefox was always the more competent and customizable browser. Happy to see users returning. Among other things, the current "Welcome Chromium/Chrome users!" megathread in the Firefox subreddit[1] seems to indicate there's something going…
To be clear, it's not pegging any core at 100% or anything so extreme. But it causes my laptop to heat up and my fans to kick in very frequently - something that almost never happens with Chromium/Webkit/Blink based browsers. If I primarily used a desktop, I wouldn't even have noticed, but a warm lap and constant fan noise makes it unusable for me.
Safari was out because I needed to run multiple browser profiles concurrently (something Firefox and Chrome support readily).
I've recently switched from Mac OS to Windows but my experience (as recently as a month ago) with Firefox leaves me feeling that it's the less mature implementation with an over zealous fan base ("it's not us, it's you!").
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Firefox is probably still a legacy mix of XUL, cpp and migrating to rust. I'm pretty sure chrome is easier to adapt.
XUL was replaced quite some time ago.
Re: Opera, Brave, Vivaldi to ignore Chrome's anti-ad-blocker changes
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't seen this talked about here but... last I checked Mozilla was in majority funded by Google royalties. What's their plan of aligning their income with essentially directly attacking their funding source?
They’re not attacking anything - I don’t think ad blockers block search ads, which are embedded into search results - and Firefox royalties have always been for search.
Of course they do.