US demands social media details from visa applicants
61–70 of 355 posts
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#62[flagged]
It might just be that YOY growth without a rolling average is always going swing wildly when a country has a lot of negative news cycles in a year and then goes relatively quiet.
The US has been looking pretty bad, pretty consistently, for a long time now.
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#63All the more reason to not have them. Though email addresses? Are they demanding all pen-names too?
My fear is the day when the absence of a social media presence itself makes you a suspicious character in the government, and AI’s eyes.
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#64"The State Department regulations say people will have to submit social media names and five years' worth of email addresses and phone numbers . When proposed last year, authorities estimated the proposal would affect 14.7 million people annually." [0] [0] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48486672
I don't think they've thought about how precise 100% compliance is literally impossible for those of us with catch-all email domains, unless we have a record of every email address at that domain we've ever given out or through which we've received unsolicited email. (Yeah, I realize that in practice they will probably accept partial compliance in that scenario, and that it won't affect me as a US citizen. But it cou…
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
1 - no. The constitution explicitly only applies to US citizens / on US soil. That's the legal rationale for a lot of 'bad behavior' such as PRISM -- they can intercept undersea cable traffic to legally spy on foreigners, as foreigners lack constitutional rights. Nothing new there.
The constitution applies to anybody living on US soil.
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#66[flagged]
Going to the US is too expensive for many who aren’y in neighboring countries. It’s also hard to get around.
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#67Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#68Also discussed a couple of days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20065142
I remember one thread which I can't find, which considered whether Hacker News counted as a site that should be disclosed. I also seem to remember a claim that having an account on a site with "Hacker" in the title was an automatic disqualification.
Hmm, this is the one I was thinking of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17635403
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on where you are coming from. Most of the Europeans that come through have the financial means and strong enough passports to go pretty much anywhere they please. Same goes for most Japanese and Chinese. My Arab customers however have the money, but getting a visa is a near impossibility.
EU travelers should understand - because the EU screens social media as part of visa applications too.
Re: US demands social media details from visa applicants
#70If enough heretics have your name in their social network, your visa will be denied. Requiring social media on visa applications is like enforcing everyone to use Truecaller (don't use it!). This feels like the start of a U.S. social credit system.
Not a fan of this, but the US is late to the game -- and has received criticism because of it. Most developed countries already screen social media when processing visa applications.