Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not surprising that people are unable to sympathize with people who they've never seen. I suggest you travel through India and you'll realize how mistaken you are, sometimes the carbon emission of a village with 100 members is less than a typical American household, specially now when LPG is rolling out even in the remotest and poorest families.
For the record; I've travelled in India and parts of Africa. That's not the point. The point is simply biology. If we reduce our population sufficiently (by whatever means), then the effects we have on the global climate may start to wear off. This is just one example of how we are reaching a limit and our species is starting to die off as a result. Given enough such situations our species may eventually reach a sust…
That means whatever nature "does" to kill humans and balance our carbon budget would have to kill 90% of all humans to have enough of an effect. If that's the plan then just nuking the 10% of humanity with the highest carbon emissions would be more efficient and more humane.