Earlier quoted context omitted.
That assumption will only allow you to pick based on a relative standard not an absolute one. Also, a degree being an eligibility criteria makes no sense. If you want to hire well then you should be willing to meet any relevant candidate. So in effect, with a degree being a REQUIREMENT you are actually lowering the pool of people who will apply and hence reducing your probability not increasing it.
The most desirable companies get so many resumes that they need to filter out most of them. I used to work for a popular search engine before Google came into the picture. As an engineer I had to interview people every week. HR handed me lots of resumes from people with CS degrees from top universities for phone screening. They didn't bother with the rest unless someone was heavily recommended by a trusted source.
Ask YC: Why the degree?
111–120 of 211 posts
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
The degree question is also silly, but has non-zero predictive capability. So do these. Certainly they rule out plenty of good programmers, but the issue is: do they leave plenty of good programmers, and a higher quality pool of remaining applicants? If good programmers read Rand or write blogs at a higher rate than bad programmers, then it works, even if it's frequently wrong about individual people.
Linus Torvalds - best programmer I've heard of doesn't write a blog. You still haven't told us who Ayn Rand is.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, you said that "normal people" would read a book "long before" going to school, which I think is not true in many domains. My second point was not just that you can learn from your peers, but that there is a social environment at a school that is important, and not readily replicated in self-study. You don't learn much from your peers at a typical cooking class, but they still contribute to why many people choos…
The stats on college attendance would seem to be against you since about 70% of the population doesn't do it or doesn't finish a 4 year degree. Those are normal people. The 30% that do attend college and finish with at least a Bachelor's are the minority. Yes, school is a social environment for learning, that has value, but it's hardly the only way to obtain that. Outside of school, there are local clubs and hobbie g…
In what country? Citation?
Here's some numbers from the UK: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/faqs/showFaq.asp?l1=2&ID...
According to that, 43% of 17-30 year olds enter higher education in the UK.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linus Torvalds - best programmer I've heard of doesn't write a blog. You still haven't told us who Ayn Rand is.
You haven't addressed the point and you can google her.
The ability to write blogs is irrelevant here too as what we most likely care about is the ability to program. Hence, the programming test.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#115Their goal is not to be perfect judges in individual cases. A crude first pass works fine for them as long as it leaves a lot of good people. http://www.paulgraham.com/judgement.html
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#116the only degree that should matter is the quality of programming/coding a person can do - a degree certificate, which is basically a paper can not guarantee the quality of a hacker and his/her skills. The society has become way too demanding - also supply and demand is off-balance. situation in india is different than in north-america ... in USA/Canada i have seen that you can still survive without a degree but in in…
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only thing pretentious about 'autodidact' is the use of the word 'pretentious' to characterize a common vocabulary word.
It's not really that common, most people wouldn't know what it meant so it is a bit pretentious. Most people really would just say "self taught".
'Autodidact' is another matter.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
The stats on college attendance would seem to be against you since about 70% of the population doesn't do it or doesn't finish a 4 year degree. Those are normal people. The 30% that do attend college and finish with at least a Bachelor's are the minority. Yes, school is a social environment for learning, that has value, but it's hardly the only way to obtain that. Outside of school, there are local clubs and hobbie g…
The stats on college attendance would seem to be against you since about 70% of the population doesn't do it... In what country? Citation? Here's some numbers from the UK: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/faqs/showFaq.asp?l1=2&ID... According to that, 43% of 17-30 year olds enter higher education in the UK.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
You haven't addressed the point and you can google her.
they are generic and poor filters. for example do you read person x. If person X isn't a household name (e.g. Bill Gates) Then it says nothing about them other than none ever introduced them to that person. I'm willing to bet there are a significant number of good C++ programmers that don't/can't care or know who Bjarne Stroustrup is. I had to look up the spelling of his name (although I don't consider myself a good…
Now take the group of programmers who have written less than 30 blog posts about programming. Y% of them are good hires, and 100-Y% are bad hires.
Is X > Y, or X == Y, or X That is the issue.
And that is the way degrees are used (when used rationally). The claim with degrees is that X is more than Y, not that most good programmers have degrees or anything else. That may be so. Then someone defended using degrees by saying there is a lack of alternative tests that are sufficiently cheap. That's not true. There are lots of cheap tests, and I have suggested 2 for which I believe X>Y is likely, and which, if studied, might turn out to have a higher X than the degree test.
Re: Ask YC: Why the degree?
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed completely. But how do you get more information cheaply? Remember, all you know is P(qualified| resume says autodidactic)= P(qualified | autodidactic) * P(autodidactic | resume says autodidactic) . The second term can easily kill you. Do you trust everything people put on their resume? On the other hand, P(degree | resume says degree) is probably close to 1, since a degree is so easy for an HR person to check.…
There are lots of other cheap filters that companies do not use. For example, "Have you read Ayn Rand?" This question may well have better predictive power than a degree. And it's not hard to verify if the person is lying about whether they've read some at all. Or, "how many blog posts do you have about programming?" Again this is easy to verify.