Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should change the name! It's a terrible name and it's cost them an inestimable amount of users.
They who place shallow attributes above merit, deserve neither.
First impressions matter.
141–143 of 143 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should change the name! It's a terrible name and it's cost them an inestimable amount of users.
They who place shallow attributes above merit, deserve neither.
First impressions matter.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Came here to say the same. Someone needs to tell these people that Twitter is not a blogging service...
One or two people have mentioned it to him before. https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1127083480674750465
He uses twitter for shorter, quick posts. A "micro" blog, if you will.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They who place shallow attributes above merit, deserve neither.
If they gave it a stupid name, why would they be any smarter in the development of the system itself? The name clearly indicates a lack of wisdom. First impressions matter.
A stupid name might do well on search engines for example (as in, those names could be easily searched)
Furthermore I don't really consider the name to be stupid. I don't quite really know of many other ways of succinctly highlighting resilience as a property in a name.