Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
231–240 of 589 posts
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#232You've elsewhere quoted 60 kWh per gallon of renewable gasoline. The US consumed 391.40 million gallons per day on average in 2018 [1], and concurrently had generation capacity for 1.153 billion kWh per day from non-hydroelectric renewable sources [2]. That suggests that full replacement of current gasoline usage would require ~23.48 billion kWh per day, which far outpaces what is currently available. Of course any r…
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
We could use the alcohols as fuels directly (in flex fuel vehicles), but this wouldn't address the much larger market for gasoline. It's a simple and inexpensive upgrade, so makes sense to do it. We will definitely take advantage of carbon credits, tax incentives, etc too!
If the alcohol upgrade to gasoline makes sense technically and economically for you, why is it not commonly done with (presumably much cheaper and extant in great volume) industrial alcohol today?
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#234Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#235Are you going to open a few "carbon neutral" gas stations? It might be great for publicity and marketing to open a few in dense urban areas with high gas prices (like LA and SF). Look at what the Apple and Tesla stores did for those companies. You could probably also charge gas prices higher than average by attracting the environmental crowd who would be willing to pay extra to fill their Priuses with carbon neutral…
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#236If atmospheric CO2 becomes a resource for the production of goods that do not release the CO2 back into the environment for reuse, would there be a risk of O2 overabundance? If left unchecked it could overcorrect for global warming and usher in an ice age.
I imagine there’s a balance point for CO2 levels and finding and maintaining that balance will be what determines humankind’s success in the long (very long) term.
See, e.g., University of Maryland. "Rise Of Oxygen Caused Earth's Earliest Ice Age." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 7 May 2009. .
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#237You've elsewhere quoted 60 kWh per gallon of renewable gasoline. The US consumed 391.40 million gallons per day on average in 2018 [1], and concurrently had generation capacity for 1.153 billion kWh per day from non-hydroelectric renewable sources [2]. That suggests that full replacement of current gasoline usage would require ~23.48 billion kWh per day, which far outpaces what is currently available. Of course any r…
The real question should be: How much improvement over time in the efficiency of this process could be expected? 1.1x? 2x? 10x? 100x? Every new technology goes through a refinement cycle where costs & resources are reduced, and I would assume the same is possible here.
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#238You mentioned you can compete with fossil fuels on (electricicity cost) that would be very dependent on where you operate (where the energy is cheapest). I suspect these would be the same places that bitcoin miners operate out from (and for the same reasons). Is this true ?
Thanks!
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#239Are you using anything to do with those nano-spike catalysts? Was one of the first things that came to mind when I read the pitch. - https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/green-tech/intervie...
Re: Launch HN: Prometheus (YC W19) – Remove CO2 from Air and Turn It into Gasoline
#240Rob -- doing something (somewhat) similar using plastic as an input (instead of co2) and getting oil as an output. You mentioned you can compete with fossil fuels on (electricicity cost) that would be very dependent on where you operate (where the energy is cheapest). I suspect these would be the same places that bitcoin miners operate out from (and for the same reasons). Is this true ? Thanks!