Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, this also worked for me on Android. Not sure why the downvotes.
Probably because this workaround consists in deactivating add-on security.
Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
181–190 of 392 posts
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#182Did this issue cause all add-on data to be wiped? After updating to 66.0.4, all of the containers I'd created with the multi-account containers add-on were gone and replaced with what appeared to be a default set of containers. I spent a lot of time setting that up—is there no way to get it all back if I don't have some sort of manual backup? And if not, what files do I need to manually back up to make sure I don't l…
I generally keep good backups of the non standard ~/.mozilla folder to compensate.
I think it was issue 339 on GitHub. They basically explain they won't add it to sync data because there is no containers on mobile.
https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/3...
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#183Did this issue cause all add-on data to be wiped? After updating to 66.0.4, all of the containers I'd created with the multi-account containers add-on were gone and replaced with what appeared to be a default set of containers. I spent a lot of time setting that up—is there no way to get it all back if I don't have some sort of manual backup? And if not, what files do I need to manually back up to make sure I don't l…
Yes, the "Firefox Multi-Account Containers" was unfortunately reset for me too.
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#184This is pretty bad for Firefox. I wonder how much people straight up & left for Chrome as a result of it.
I left for Chrome in a way via Brave. Brave is based on Chrome minus being owned by the All-Seeing-Eye Company in Mountainview.
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#185Did this issue cause all add-on data to be wiped? After updating to 66.0.4, all of the containers I'd created with the multi-account containers add-on were gone and replaced with what appeared to be a default set of containers. I spent a lot of time setting that up—is there no way to get it all back if I don't have some sort of manual backup? And if not, what files do I need to manually back up to make sure I don't l…
> If add-ons that use Containers functionality (such as Multi-Account Containers and Facebook Container) were disabled as part of this problem, any lost site data or custom configurations for those add-ons will not be recovered by this release. Users may need to set them up and login again in about:addons (Bug 1549204).
> Themes may not be re-enabled. Users may need to re-enable them in about:addons (Bug 1549022).
> Home page or search settings customized by an add-on may be reset to defaults. Users may need to customize them again in about:preferences or about:addons
I don't know if there is a way to manually recover the settings you lost. It might be a good idea to check the related links in the release notes for more info.
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please provide a source that uBlock Origin is the #1 contributor to Firefox slowness, resource usage, and crashes.
I have only my memories, which is what IIRC means: “if I remember correctly”. A few seconds of searching offers no better answer, so you’ll simply have to downvote me and move on. (For those who want to investigate further, I believe it was about a year ago and would have been on planet.mozilla.org at the time. No, I didn’t post it to HN because I don’t usually consider anti-adblock positions to be safe to discuss he…
This article [1] shows how ABP is, indeed, a resource hog, compared to uBlock Origin. It also shows that pages load quicker with uBlock Origin than vanilla. Its an article from 2 years ago though.
This article [2] talks about how in december 2018 uBlock Origin uses WASM for better performance. It includes a link to benchmark the software.
This article [3] from begin 2019 compares the performance of different adblockers (the article is by the authors of Ghostery though therefore I link to the Reddit discussion).
[1] https://www.raymond.cc/blog/10-ad-blocking-extensions-tested...
[2] https://www.ghacks.net/2018/12/03/ublock-origin-performance-...
[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/ar7a3m/adbloc...
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#187This is pretty bad for Firefox. I wonder how much people straight up & left for Chrome as a result of it.
People will bitch for a few days then they'll get over it.
This is a shitty screwup but I'm not about to jump ship over it.
Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#188Re: Firefox 66.0.4 is out, fixes disabled add-ons
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt this. There are extension update pings, and my guess is that the number of users is deducted from the update pings, but I could be wrong.
“How dare Firefox check for updates from a remote server” is a real thing that’s been said in support of many “privacy” guides that disable all Firefox and addons autoupdates, so I wouldn’t bet the farm either way.