Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

forbes.com

51–60 of 75 posts

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#51
post #48
post #14

[flagged]

> I will not associate with any business or person who is Chinese. Are my thoughts misguided here? Yes, that's deeply misguided and, worse, totally unacceptable in HN comments. Conflating Chinese people with Nazis is beyond the pale, just as it would be for any nation. Imagine what it would be like for someone with a background from China to be browsing HN and run across a statement like that. At least a minimal abil…

> I don't know what we can do to prevent HN from sliding into the hell of nationalistic flamewar. The problem is getting noticeably worse and it's deeply dismaying.

dang: its not an easy task for sure, and I agree it's deeply dismaying.

Politics, unlike FPGAs or software architecture, is something that anyone can have an opinion on. There is no barrier to entry and thus anyone and everyone who has ever consumed a news clip is free to participate with their strong opinions. Expertise is just a wikipedia article away. In the heat of the debate, there are often flashes of vitriol (i.e - some of my comments in this thread are needlessly provocative). Mainstream media headlines seem deliberately designed to illicit exactly the kind of nationalistic flamewar you describe.

In my estimation, China appears to be the current topic that people feel the most strongly about. Everyone desires a clearly defined ‘evil’ thing to rally against. I’m not sure what the solution is. Topics on politics+China cannot be banned as the website would immediately be accused of censorship and mollification due to conflicting interests (i.e YC China).

But if people are to discuss and debate contentious topics, they should do so in an informed and good faith manner - something which can only be manually enforced by mods. The current status quo of manual moderation and the flagging system seems to be working ok, but may be a constant and growing burden for mods to constantly educate, warn and ban users for inappropriate comments.

Maybe there could be an automated pre-warning pinned to the top of heavily flagged topics? I’ve seen it done on Reddit (for example [1]) to decent effect: a gentle reminder of the posting guidelines localized at the scene of, and tailored to the specific topic (since certain topics tend to draw in certain types of comments time and time again). It might allow users the opportunity to think twice about what they are about to post.

Might be something to consider.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/bkmdtr/joe_biden_...

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#52
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I will not associate with any business or person who is Chinese. Are my thoughts misguided here? Yes, that's deeply misguided and, worse, totally unacceptable in HN comments. Conflating Chinese people with Nazis is beyond the pale, just as it would be for any nation. Imagine what it would be like for someone with a background from China to be browsing HN and run across a statement like that. At least a minimal abil…

> I don't know what we can do to prevent HN from sliding into the hell of nationalistic flamewar. The problem is getting noticeably worse and it's deeply dismaying. dang: its not an easy task for sure, and I agree it's deeply dismaying. Politics, unlike FPGAs or software architecture, is something that anyone can have an opinion on. There is no barrier to entry and thus anyone and everyone who has ever consumed a new…

Mods can't make people respect each other. It's too much.

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know this guy specifically, but it's been reported by other sources. This is a real thing that's happening. I find the general Chinese apologism on this site strange. Even if it were 13k why would it not be an issue that China is placing people in concentration camps? Not even to get into the argument about the reliability of the 13k number because that's just laughable given literally every source that isn't…

There is not "general Chinese apologism" on HN. What there is, is divisiveness on China-related topics that is growing for social, geopolitical, and media reasons completely beyond the scope of this site. Moreover, the population on HN is majority Western (50% US, 30% Europe, 7% Australia/Canada, if I remember correctly), so views here are skewed in rather the opposite direction to what you suggest. HN users don't ha…

Even if the population follows that distribution it doesn't mean the comments follow a homogonous reflection of the dominant opinion of the population.

I apologize if the apologism comment went too far. It is my perception in reading HN comments, and is not meant to be a normative view of the facts, and especially not meant to be nationalist comment.

You also did not add anything to the discussion by trying to call me out as "disrespectful." This just further derails the discussion. I don't know what the goal of your comment was, but to get the discussion back on track I'll just add more sources to bolster my position and let any substantive discussion follow:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/25/at-least-12000...

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/muslims-in-china-p...

https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/china-s-xinjiang-...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p06gds2h

https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/28/a-summer-vacation-in-ch...

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-06-20/ree...

https://www.ft.com/content/ac0ffb2e-8b36-11e8-b18d-0181731a0...

https://chinachange.org/2018/08/10/a-call-for-a-un-investiga...

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#54

I actually find the evolution of this blatant, shameless propaganda amusing. You could actually observe, in real-time, the ramping up of accusations and headline hysterics in sequence: 1. 50k muslims detained 2. 100k muslims detained and put into re-education camps 3. 500k muslims arrested and put into concentration camps! 4. One million muslims torn out of homes and put into concentration camps and getting their org…

One, you should provide citations for the numbers specified in your claims, otherwise they are an ad absurdum argument.

And two, maybe the number did increase? It's been reported by multiple sources in multiple countries, and been addressed by the UN (see my previous comment with sources), I don't know what other burden of support you could logically need.

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#55
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it true, though? You are arguing that its baseless propaganda without refuting anything. Just that the evolution of the claims has gotten more severe. The best argument if so is just the truth. Link sources and publish things showing there really aren't 3 million people detained or that it's not a camp-style thing. The problem with Iraq is that Saddam simply could have told the truth and let UN inspectors in, but…

The burden of proof is not on me to prove they aren't doing these things. The burden of proof is on those doing the accusing. As in the case of Huawei, there has not been one objective shred of proof. And no, I don't consider WaPo, NYT, and its ilk anywhere near objective journalism. If the lack of proof is because the CCP is denying journalists access to Xinjiang, then how can there be any conclusive evidence? Are t…

There has been plenty of proof. See my other comments. There has not been any proof that they don't exist. If you're making a positive claim you need to add sources. Otherwise you're getting into a celestial teapot argument. "Can't disprove it so it has to be true."

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#56
post #44
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Insinuating that someone is shilling is explicitly against the site guidelines. Saying you're not saying it is saying it. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here. And please keep nationalistic flamewar far away from this site.

This feels like an overly broad and disingenuous interpretation of the word shilling. He provided an alternative view, bolstered with facts (and yes, went overboard with Nazism comparisons).

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#57
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

" Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

The strongest possible interpretation of "You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies" is that it's wrong to judge China for locking up more than a million people of a specific ethnicity in concentration camps.

I'm not sure what other interpretation there is. As I said before, Andrew Jackson had similar justifications when he ordered the removal of Native Americans. It was wrong then despite the fact that America wasn't a modern democracy at the time (since most people lacked the right to vote).

And FDR had similar justifications when he rounded up Japanese Americans. That was wrong as well.

I'm not sure why it's so hard to reach a consensus that ethnic concentration camps should be universally condemned without devolving into a nationalistic flame war about who committed the worst atrocities.

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#58
post #57
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

The strongest possible interpretation of "You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies" is that it's wrong to judge China for locking up more than a million people of a specific ethnicity in concentration camps. I'm not sure what other interpretation there is. As I said before, Andrew Jackson had similar justifications when he ordered the removal of Native Americans. It w…

Once again, context matters. The context of the sentence:

>"You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies"

was one of mass surveillance and the social media crackdown and absolutely does not pertain to any camps of any kind.

You are once again not responding to the strongest plausible interpretation of what I have said, instead choosing to argue against a straw-man and then repeating your point about how Andrew Jackson carried out genocide.

Do you see the problem?

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#59
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The strongest possible interpretation of "You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies" is that it's wrong to judge China for locking up more than a million people of a specific ethnicity in concentration camps. I'm not sure what other interpretation there is. As I said before, Andrew Jackson had similar justifications when he ordered the removal of Native Americans. It w…

Once again, context matters. The context of the sentence: >"You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies" was one of mass surveillance and the social media crackdown and absolutely does not pertain to any camps of any kind. You are once again not responding to the strongest plausible interpretation of what I have said, instead choosing to argue against a straw-man and the…

My apologies. Since that was your final paragraph I took it as your overall conclusion. I didn't realize that the quoted paragraph was exclusively referring to your point about surveillance.

So to be clear you unambiguously condemn the Chinese government for their role in operating ethnic internment camps, and while you disagree with the specifics, you agree that they are operating ethnic internment camps?

Also you don't think it's wrong to judge the Chinese government for doing this?

Re: U.S. Accuses China of Detaining Up to 3M Muslims in 'Concentration Camps'

#60
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once again, context matters. The context of the sentence: >"You can't judge China by the same standards as modern, highly educated western democracies" was one of mass surveillance and the social media crackdown and absolutely does not pertain to any camps of any kind. You are once again not responding to the strongest plausible interpretation of what I have said, instead choosing to argue against a straw-man and the…

My apologies. Since that was your final paragraph I took it as your overall conclusion. I didn't realize that the quoted paragraph was exclusively referring to your point about surveillance. So to be clear you unambiguously condemn the Chinese government for their role in operating ethnic internment camps, and while you disagree with the specifics, you agree that they are operating ethnic internment camps? Also you d…

> So to be clear you unambiguously condemn the Chinese government for their role in operating ethnic internment camps, and while you disagree with the specifics, you agree that they are operating ethnic internment camps?

No. I don't unambiguously condemn the Chinese government for their role in operating ethnic internment camps because it is not at all unambiguous that this is what they are doing. Why should I?

What they are doing and what they are trying to accomplish is operating extremist "re-education" camps due to the many terrorist incidents in the region [1] including the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of Han Chinese (which, by the way, is never mentioned anywhere to contextualize the CCP's actions, nor is it condemned). I don't dispute that many people put there are indeed of ethnic Uighur in origin but their ideology is of primary concern, not their ethnicity. I do believe there is such a thing as "wrong-think" when it comes to extremist ideology. I don't dispute that many of them are likely innocent of harbouring extremist ideology and placed there against their will -I will always condemn the detainment of innocents.

>Also you don't think it's wrong to judge the Chinese government for doing this?

Before rushing to grab the pitchforks, let's pause for a second to consider two facts:

1. There were numerous religion-fuelled [2] terrorist incidents in the region (machete attacks, car bombs, plane hijackings, etc).

2. There were episodes of ethnic cleansing resulting in mass civilian casualties in the region, carried out by thousands of anonymous, unidentifiable ethnic minorities against Han Chinese (we know this because all the casualties were Han Chinese). Only a tiny fraction of those involved were ever held responsible for their actions and prosecuted.

What would be the appropriate way to handle the situation to prevent further loss of life and regional destabilization? Would you invite international condemnation and sanctions by placing millions of ethnic minorities into concentration camps, tearing them from their families in order to torture or work them to death? If it's obvious to any layman that this would only incite more international scrutiny, more terrorism, and more destabilization, don't you think it would be obvious to the policy planners in charge as well?

Contrary to common knowledge, China has dozens of culturally diverse, minority ethnic groups. Their cultures are often promoted and showcased as a matter of national pride. Almost none of them clash with the CCP, and tourism is in fact encouraged in those poorer, rural areas to help subsidize the locals' incomes. What could the CCP possibly hope to achieve by specifically targeting and crushing Uighur culture for the sole purpose of doing so?

The CCP, pragmatic as only an authoritarian, technocracy can be, opted for forceful "re-education" and augmented surveillance in order to prevent further terrorist events and to stamp out religious extremism. Is that really so hard to believe?

You may condemn the inevitable abuses carried out by individuals with authority within these camps, which occurs not as a matter of official policy but as a matter of human nature. You may condemn the CCP for being hard-handed in their response to domestic terrorism. You may condemn the inevitable but incidental detention of innocents which will result from such actions. You may not condemn the CCP based on unsubstantiated, editorialized headlines designed by the mainstream media to advance a political narrative.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_China#Chronology_... [2] "We have to conquer our own country and purify it of all infidels. Then, we should conquer the infidels' countries and spread Islam. The infidels who are usurping our countries have announced war against Islam and Muslims, forcing Muslims to abandon Islam and change their beliefs." – Abdullah Mansour, current leader of the Uyghur separatist movement Turkistan Islamic Party (East Turkestan Islamic Movement), from "The Duty of Faith and Support," Voice of Islam/al-Fajr Media Center, August 26, 2009.

Post reply on HN