31–40 of 260 posts
Surprised Tether is willing to open it's mouth on this subject. Glass houses...stones...
[1] https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/attorney-general-james-annou...
Bitfinex money was on an account of a small Polish bank. It was confiscated by a US government when they chased Colombian drug cartels earlier in 2018. There was no proper segregation of client funds by their payment processor Crypto Capital Corp. Looks like Tether was collateral damage. Polish source: https://zaufanatrzeciastrona.pl/post/gielda-bitfinex-zgubila... (please use Google translator)
What would happen if the US Government stepped in and took over Tether? Would it be feasible for a different foreign government to do so?
I suspect the likely outcome (eventually.. and if Bitfinex doesnt fold first) is the US government seizing their domain to prevent them from continuing to commit fraud.
Edit: missed a word
My bank only needs to keep 10% of its deposits backed by cash, securities. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_requirement#United_Sta...
You are misunderstanding fractional reserve banking. Fractional reserve banking means that the bank only has to keep enough cash on hand to meet their expected reasonable obligations. Banks still need their books to balance. That means that their liabilities can not exceed their assets. A bank can be solvent on paper but if there was a rush to withdraw by their customers, they may not be able to pay cash for all with…
Stableishcoin!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are misunderstanding fractional reserve banking. Fractional reserve banking means that the bank only has to keep enough cash on hand to meet their expected reasonable obligations. Banks still need their books to balance. That means that their liabilities can not exceed their assets. A bank can be solvent on paper but if there was a rush to withdraw by their customers, they may not be able to pay cash for all with…
Bankruptcy doesn’t mean assets Why does the market allow this? ... I have no clue but I would guess that money laundering fits into it somewhere.
Bitfinex money was on an account of a small Polish bank. It was confiscated by a US government when they chased Colombian drug cartels earlier in 2018. There was no proper segregation of client funds by their payment processor Crypto Capital Corp. Looks like Tether was collateral damage. Polish source: https://zaufanatrzeciastrona.pl/post/gielda-bitfinex-zgubila... (please use Google translator)
https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/attorney-general-james-annou...
The only reason to swap funds between those accounts would be if the parties knew that there was more risk than normal cash reserves for the money that Tether would end up having - and this was deemed by Tether operators to be an acceptable risk not worth disclosing. Not a shining beacon of cleanliness here.
My bank only needs to keep 10% of its deposits backed by cash, securities. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_requirement#United_Sta...
You are misunderstanding fractional reserve banking. Fractional reserve banking means that the bank only has to keep enough cash on hand to meet their expected reasonable obligations. Banks still need their books to balance. That means that their liabilities can not exceed their assets. A bank can be solvent on paper but if there was a rush to withdraw by their customers, they may not be able to pay cash for all with…
You can't undisputedly say Bitfinex won't be able to pay the loan. Maybe the frozen assets are real and will be unfrozen soon. Nobody knows. They aren't bankrupt yet, but in a very risky position of becoming so.
Another possibility is that you misread the article title, which seems kind of misleading. It says that only 74% of Tether is backed by cash or cash-equivalents. The loan to Bitfinex is neither, so it should be the remaining 26% (26% of $2.8B is $745M).
That being said, I agree with you on the Wiley Coyote point. Tether should be completely disreputable, not only because of it's risky situation, but because the whole move was completely shady. Silently changing the wording of the website, after assuring everyone that they had it 100% backed... I don't see how anyone can trust it anymore.
Yet the Tether price of BTC is only 6% below the USD price: http://www.untether.space/
Question -- why does this matter to me? As long as the market agrees to trade it for around 1.00 USD, +/- a few %, which seems to generally be happening, it shouldn't matter to me whether it's backed or not. It's just an abstract notion that the market has agreed to trade at a certain price. (It's not like I would hold onto USDT for a long time anyway -- it's only there to facilitate short-term needs. If I wanted to…
This very fact will actually cause a run on the bank in any sort of crisis. You don't need to actually believe that tether is a complete sham and has no money to decide to withdraw. You just need to worry that 74% of people might get worried. Because if they all withdraw, you will get none of your money.
The point of FDIC insurance (aka lender of last resort) is that when you hear that Wells Fargo is in trouble you don't worry about your checking account going to zero. This used to happen quite a bit as late as during the great depression in the early 1930s. Being 100% backed by liquid assets was supposed to serve that function, it's not a nice to have, it's the whole point.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Question -- why does this matter to me? As long as the market agrees to trade it for around 1.00 USD, +/- a few %, which seems to generally be happening, it shouldn't matter to me whether it's backed or not. It's just an abstract notion that the market has agreed to trade at a certain price. (It's not like I would hold onto USDT for a long time anyway -- it's only there to facilitate short-term needs. If I wanted to…
Because if there is a "run on the bank", someone will end up short. Either the first people out will get 100% of their money and last 26% will get zero, or everyone will get 74% of their money. This very fact will actually cause a run on the bank in any sort of crisis. You don't need to actually believe that tether is a complete sham and has no money to decide to withdraw. You just need to worry that 74% of people mi…