Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where do you think did I not address the things I quoted? Quote: "People know what they need to do" - your response to that: ignore it, don't address it. Quote: "that knowledge doesn’t change behavior" - your response to that: ignore knowledge entirely, state that "smarts" changes behaviour. Quote: "Humans are hard-wired to conserve energy (citation)" - your response to that: don't address it, implicitly dismiss it,…
So, you are implying these are my responses even though I never actually wrote them? How is that different from telling me I did not supply citations?
When you say "work to get smarter instead", that says the problem is a lack of work and a lack of "smart", and therefore that people are ill because they're dumb. It follows from what you said, even though you did not write those words out. So yes, I imply that your responses are your responses.
How is that different from telling me I did not supply citations?
I don't want to read citations, I mentioned them as one example of what "addressing a point" could look like, so that the absence of any of these possible things supports that you didn't address them.