Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let me quote the full paragraph: >> In his view, that means rethinking how Twitter incentivizes user behavior. He suggested that the service works best as an “interest-based network,” where you log in and see content relevant to your interests, no matter who posted it — rather than a network where everyone feels like they need to follow a bunch of other accounts, and then grow their follower numbers in turn. What he…
Sounds a lot closer? It's exactly reddit. I configured twitter to keep tweets in chronological order and not to filter anything, so I only see tweets from accounts I follow, and I see all their tweets, and see them in chron. order. What he wants to do is copy reddit. I can't see what they could add to reddit, but they'd completely lose what twitter is good at (following people).
Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
331–340 of 369 posts
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
+1000 This completely ruins using Twitter as an official support channel for a business. I want to be notified immediately whenever my company is mentioned, but enabling email/push notifications so that I'm aware of these asap also means constantly opening Twitter just to dismiss whatever unsolicited spam they're trying to put in front of me. It adds up to quite a lot of wasted time and is a downright obnoxious user…
why on earth should Twitter be an official support channel for a business? Note that the poster said " an official support channel" rather than " the official support channel". Adding more ways for customers to contact support is usually a good thing. There was no mention of taking away other channels that you might prefer.
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a funny one. I worked at a place where the support team that worked for the social network accounts of the company had better tools and higher priority when doing their jobs than the phone/site support team, so effectively customers asking for support on Twitter or Facebook got better and faster support than customers asking for support on the phone or the site. I assume that's because companies are terrified…
> bad publicity on social networks Exactly. Social networks moved support from private, hidden systems to a public channel. This benefitted the user, since the brand has more to lose from interactions that are negative, non-responsive, re-directive, etc.
You know. Assholes.
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#334I use https://twitterfall.com/ as my main interface for Twitter It just streams downward from the top, no need to refresh. It's not pretty but I like it. Also, I don't recognize the issues lots of people have with Twitter, because I mostly only see the original tweets and only follow mostly sensible people that post interesting stuff (scientists, AI & robotics folks, tech journalists, some space exploration accounts)…
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is an honest question - why on earth should Twitter be an official support channel for a business? If I had a business, I would respond to Twitter support requests with “please see our support website for how to contact us” or “thanks, we are now contacting you.” I don’t know why Twitter users should get better support and it seems odd to me to rely on Twitter to provide or to ask for support.
I really hate when a company lists "Support Email" address and never replies to it. Dozens of companies did this to me (sent from my gmail). And yet in horrible and unusable twitter or slightly less horrible facebook they reply in hours, or even minutes.
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's kind of the point though - I had no idea this feature existed until they started pushing it to me. I think it's too much to expect users to opt-in to things. How would I have known to opt-in to this? Yet I am now much happier because they improved the UX for me. I think opt-out makes sense though, for users who don't a feature.
i can see no way to opt out of it either
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#337Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I really dislike is the spam in the notifications section. If someone likes my tweet, replies to it or retweets it, that's relevant. I don't however want to see a notification for something Tweeter deems interesting under other people you follow liked/retweed this as a notification.
Agreed. I wish that they would just mix those into the primary feed. I keep using the "See less often" option, but the "Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your experience better." message that I get in response almost feels like a taunt at this point. I want to turn them off completely.
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#338Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "sparkle setting" resets if you haven't been on Twitter Web for a while, even if you always keep up with Twitter on mobile. I use Twitter Web so infrequently that whenever I open it, it has always changed back to the "Top Tweets" view.
Even on the new Twitter Web UI it automatically changes back from "Latest Tweets" to "Home", although I visit the site several times per day. If only Twitter had separate URLs for the two styles, then I could just update my bookmark...
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#339Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone who's in a position to use Tweetdeck instead of Twitter's web UI will find a free, Twitter-maintained, product with no annoying algorithms and no advertising. It's the version of Twitter targeted at newsrooms, etc. I assume a lot of people already know and have reasons why they don't... but likely not everyone here has tried it so it may be worth repeating. https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/
It says I have messages, but I don't seem to have figured out how to view them.
Re: Jack Dorsey says it’s time to rethink the fundamental dynamics of Twitter
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that’s right. Personal faith from funders is a significant contributor to getting funding, which is important for success.
It's a contributor to funding sure, but that's not what I asked. The issue is, would a random person off the street be able to take VC seed money and turn it into a billion dollar business? The answer is obviously no. And they definitely wouldn't be able to do it twice.
But that’s not the point... apparently you’re saying he deserves his success by merit. My opinion is that there are plenty of people of equal merits who didn’t start one of the top 3 social networks. I would attribute much of the success of Twitter and Facebook to chance.