Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found the opposite. I started using DDG when I moved to Brave but after a month, I found I would go to DDG, search page after page and get frustrated and open google and have my result on page one or two.
I've heard others say similar things. That's simply not my experience. I wonder if it depends on the sorts of searches that we each tend to perform?
It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
251–260 of 311 posts
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#252BUT... now we have a big problem with what google filters and promotes. It has altered its search engine to ignore search modifiers in some of its products. Such examples, Google wants to be in the TV/Entertainment business so its promoting hollywood above content creators. And many results favor CNN/NBC on its platforms, even with "exact title searches". Its using its business models to override consumers wants.
Its like google turned the search into a BuzzFeed top 10 generator.
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do I get updates on the groups project? Wiby seems amazing - the first three surprise me links were a human powered ornithopter, lego maniacs and a guide to knife throwing. Thank you for sharing!
The group mostly converses on micro.blog. I cover the various conversations and new discoveries on my site (kickscondor.com). Do you just want to follow along? Or do you have some ideas to share? This is a very new group that has sprung up in the last few months.
Glad this is becoming more organized and I will follow along with interest.
It brings back a little of the wonder of the old web.
A smaller subset somehow seems bigger, more infinite.
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#254Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if your site is perfect according to Search Console/Webmaster Tools, that won't get you listed on Google Search.
Google Search Console will tell you what pages were submitted (via sitemap) and what pages are indexed as well as any errors.
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#255Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, i'm having to go several pages deep and even then not finding anything relevant, I've started to use other search engines and reddit to actually find useful info.
Google poured billions into their search engine for two decades to make it better . Now that have a ridiculous amount of money and power, the search results get.... objectively worse . Which brings us to the elephant in the room: what are Google's motives behind this (clearly intentional) change? Could something as innocent as training a new neural net or testing a buggy version of the algorithm on subsets of users.…
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#256Unfortunately google is the only way to search old usenet archives from the web, since they bought out such archives. That search leaves much to be desired. Only the relevance search has results for usenet posts, you can't order by date, and other then using date ranges, there's no way to only see usenet posts. For example searching for "gamer" before 1/1/2000: relevance https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/%22ga…
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#257Google is the old web, no wonder The similarities between Hoolie and Google.
(hooli is a fictional company in the HBO series Sillicon Valley)
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#258Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anecdotally and perhaps unrelated - has anyone else noticed a decrease in the accuracy and general quality of Google search over the past 2-4 months? They've had to have been utilizing ML to 'improve' searches for some time now, but the quality of the results has decreased suddenly and inexplicably (for me).
Personally, my impression is that since at least ~1-4 years, the google searches return less exact matches especially when I search for an exact match of an error message, or multiple exact matches involving the same error message (when I start to become desperate I usually tend to split the error into 2 parts...). On the other hand the non-exact hits that it returns push me from time to time in the right direction.…
So ... although I feel like we might be having the same issue, I'm not sure I'm using DDG correctly enough to say it's a problem.
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#259Personally, a year ago I have switched the defaults to duckduckgo.com on my devices, works OK for me so far.
Re: It seems that Google is forgetting the old web
#260While it's become impossible to browse the wider Web with Google, it's getting a bit easier elsewhere. A few helpful search engines: * https://millionshort.com/ * https://wiby.me/ * https://pinboard.in/search/ A recent movement to build personal Yahoo!-style directories: * https://href.cool/ (my own project) * https://indieseek.xyz/ * https://districts.neocities.org/ * https://the.dailywebthing.com/ The above resourc…