While you are, of course, welcome to call upon Google to improve the review speed, there are obvious things you can do on your side as well. First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. In the meantime, you can offer your users to switch to "developer mode" and install the extension manually. I personally would be against the centralized nature of Chrome extens…
> First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. Are you a developer? This is literally the definition of continuous delivery.
Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
21–30 of 46 posts
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#22A "5 line diff" is absolutely enough code to add something malicious.
Why does it take a week to accept/deny that...? Note that they aren't actually DOING anything in this week. The Polar extension is literally just sitting waiting for someone to approve it because I updated the images.
Anyways, I get that the turnaround time stinks.
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#23While you are, of course, welcome to call upon Google to improve the review speed, there are obvious things you can do on your side as well. First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. In the meantime, you can offer your users to switch to "developer mode" and install the extension manually. I personally would be against the centralized nature of Chrome extens…
> First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. Are you a developer? This is literally the definition of continuous delivery.
This way, you only need to push a new extension update whenever you need new api-level functionality, and you have total control over the rest of the user experience (regular HTML/CSS/javascript).
Or would this cause the extension to be rejected by Google, on the grounds that the "api" that it adds would be too open to abuse?
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#24A "5 line diff" is absolutely enough code to add something malicious.
Why does it take a week to accept/deny that...? Note that they aren't actually DOING anything in this week. The Polar extension is literally just sitting waiting for someone to approve it because I updated the images.
Because they have to check hundreds of thousands of applications a day, most of which improve stupid things like typos. Having the biggest part of the cake doesn't help either.
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#25While you are, of course, welcome to call upon Google to improve the review speed, there are obvious things you can do on your side as well. First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. In the meantime, you can offer your users to switch to "developer mode" and install the extension manually. I personally would be against the centralized nature of Chrome extens…
> First up: improve the QA process on your extension to avoid having to do 5-line diffs every few days. Are you a developer? This is literally the definition of continuous delivery.
But even if it were, why do you think continuous delivery is the appropriate choice of workflow when you don't actually control the "delivery" part?
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#26I'm looking to switch away from Calibre (which has a cluttered user interface) and if Polar supports common ebook formats it might be worth trying.
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a typo? Did you read the post? If I update the text or change a typo they take a week to release the update. During this time I can't release another version of my app.
They don't know you only fixed a typo until they've had time to review it
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#28Given how much malware the Chrome Web Store pushes, and how sensitive of data extensions have access to, actually taking the time to properly review updates is absolutely warranted.
We don’t let drug companies sell their products to everyone the second it’s produced. First you test in mice, then 10 people, then 100, then 1000, then, and only then, can you release it to an entire population (roughly speaking).
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#29While this might be highly burdensome for developers, I much prefer the world where Google reviews even single-line changes to extensions.
Re: Google Killing Chrome Extensions with 1 Week Publishing Delays
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a typo? Did you read the post? If I update the text or change a typo they take a week to release the update. During this time I can't release another version of my app.
They don't know you only fixed a typo until they've had time to review it