Earlier quoted context omitted.
> accredited lab Accredited by who? > detailed report with reference ranges, recommendations, and caveats. I can generate detailed reports. With references and ranges. My point still stands, if you think what they are perscribing works, go get tested again with a different lab. More than likely you'll have just as negative a report come back with exactly the same recommendations. Naturopathy is pseudoscience.
Seems like you got an axe to grind, but I'll bite. This is the lab in my case: http://rmalab.com/about-us/accreditation > Naturopathy is pseudoscience Agreed. However, many NDs are not exactly "naturopathic", but more like alternative doctors that can fill in the gaps if your conventional MD is not very helpful.
However, I question the accreditation standards. This lab offers
Hair element analysis http://rmalab.com/medical-laboratory-tests/environmental/hai...
Which is bunk https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/19343...
and
Nutrigenomix http://rmalab.com/Nutrigenomix
also bunk (or at very least, extremely overselling benefits) https://www.nature.com/articles/ejcn2012145
NDs are snake oil sales men peddling placebos. The axe I have to grind is against people offering fake solutions to real problems. Pseudo science medicines, including naturopathy, gets people killed.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/stephan-meningitis-deat...