Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you determine who owns water in the first place.
In a world in which transaction costs are sufficiently low, Coase's Theorem says it doesn't matter: you make the best initial choice you can, and then people execute free market trades to get to the overall most efficient allocation. So one way of looking at the whole problem is to ask why transaction costs are too high to make this feasible. And the obvious answer is politics.
California declared drought free for first time in seven years
241–242 of 242 posts
Re: California declared drought free for first time in seven years
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
It all melts. I trust that the experts know the difference between permanent snow and annual melting. They use satellite pictures to determine how much water will be available after it melts. Edit: If someone knows more about the planning process than I do, please chime in.
To be pedantic: You say "It all melts", and then "I trust that the experts know the difference between permanent snow....". I hypothesised satellite photos, I'm not sure if depth of snow is relevant for more than just volume, and whether you could get good estimates of depth (and density???) from a satellite.
Don't forget that modern satellites are topographical with a high degree of accuracy. We can use satellites to learn snowpack depth.
This is how we know that the aquifers are depleted because the satellites measure elevation above the aquifer.