I wonder pilots are feeling about it? It will cause a very big stink if one crashes in the US.
At that point, not only will Boeing be at fault, but heads at FAA as well. On the other hand, FAA is known to be very strict when it comes to safety. So, I feel like they must think that US pilots are trained for what the alleged issue seems to be (MCAS).
US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
31–40 of 344 posts
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
The FAA was intentionally made independent of airline advocacy to avoid conflicts of interest that previous government agencies overseeing air travel in the past had. So it’s odd if it’s not based on the data.
If it's based on data why not publishing it?
We have assumptions, and there's a public perception - but it may not be correct.
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#33What does the US know that the EU or China doesn't which gives them such confidence? Any clues?
In short, the Max-8 ships with a shitty default configuration. After the first crash, the FAA and the major american airlines with these planes aggressively updated the instrument panel settings, warnings and processes to ensure pilots were aware if there was a sensor disagreement that could cause the MCAS system to accidentally stall. (I know this is true for Southwest, I assume the rest followed suit.) While the de…
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
The FAA was intentionally made independent of airline advocacy to avoid conflicts of interest that previous government agencies overseeing air travel in the past had. So it’s odd if it’s not based on the data.
If it's based on data why not publishing it?
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#35Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
In short, the Max-8 ships with a shitty default configuration. After the first crash, the FAA and the major american airlines with these planes aggressively updated the instrument panel settings, warnings and processes to ensure pilots were aware if there was a sensor disagreement that could cause the MCAS system to accidentally stall. (I know this is true for Southwest, I assume the rest followed suit.) While the de…
You mentioned "know this is true for Southwest" do you have a source by chance?
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#37From a customer perspective I would have appreciated a joint approach of the major aviation agencies. The way it is handled right now, I can’t judge whether the EU is reacting shortsighted or if the US is too careless. One seems to be true?
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
At that point, not only will Boeing be at fault, but heads at FAA as well. On the other hand, FAA is known to be very strict when it comes to safety. So, I feel like they must think that US pilots are trained for what the alleged issue seems to be (MCAS).
Still, that wouldn’t help foreign planes crashing into our cities.
problem solved we did it America
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#39What I dont understand is why the airlines themselves (Southwest and American) are refusing to halt the planes - this seems totally irresponsible with what is known at this point.
If this turns out to have been a terrorist attack or something like that, a lot of people are going to have to eat their words, and millions of dollars will have been wasted for nothing.
Re: US refuses to ground Boeing 737 Max
#40From a customer perspective I would have appreciated a joint approach of the major aviation agencies. The way it is handled right now, I can’t judge whether the EU is reacting shortsighted or if the US is too careless. One seems to be true?
None, US politicians are looking after their self-interest. Lobbying strikes again!