31–40 of 61 posts
If advisory of German specialists from the either side will make the internet in the EU anything like the internet in Germany, in any regard, people will be really pissed. Kindly bugger off and let decide those from the places were the internet works.
This comes as a surprise to no one but Axel Voss.
Nah there are a lot of artists that think it's just fine to censor the entire internet so that they can make more money James Blunt is one of them https://twitter.com/CDU_CSU_EP/status/1098531302490468352 and "helping" the CDU campaign
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they benefit.
How? E.g.: Google wouldn't be able to display website content descriptions for free anymore (OK, they are allowed to display a few words of the description). I understand that content creators will benefit most (e.g. news sites).
So, let Article 13 take place and lots of competition will vanish.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the number of voters is low, it's actually easier to mobilise voters to vote against the people who support Article 13.
also the most effective way is to write a letter or call them in person (engaging them on facebook etc has little value in comparison)
For those in Germany they can use this service to help them assemble a letter to be send by post https://botbrief.eu/
This site also helps you call them directly https://pledge2019.eu (please be polite - the best way we can win them is not by acting like we don't know what we're talking about)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How? E.g.: Google wouldn't be able to display website content descriptions for free anymore (OK, they are allowed to display a few words of the description). I understand that content creators will benefit most (e.g. news sites).
Who will be able to run infrastructure in terms of money and people that will fulfill the requirements of Article 13? Only the big players. So, let Article 13 take place and lots of competition will vanish.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How? E.g.: Google wouldn't be able to display website content descriptions for free anymore (OK, they are allowed to display a few words of the description). I understand that content creators will benefit most (e.g. news sites).
Regulation is good for the big guys. It hurts Google less than it hurts competition.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the number of voters is low, it's actually easier to mobilise voters to vote against the people who support Article 13.
also the most effective way is to write a letter or call them in person (engaging them on facebook etc has little value in comparison)
I'm based in Belgium, but if this bill passes, it leaves me no choice but to take my company abroad. Funny how the EU tries to compete with US startups and multinationals, with various incentives, and then tries to get this crap enforced on all of these same companies within the EU.
Bunch of idiots.
Although I live within the EU, I hope various companies will block access to their services.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who will be able to run infrastructure in terms of money and people that will fulfill the requirements of Article 13? Only the big players. So, let Article 13 take place and lots of competition will vanish.
Sure, I am with you. However, I also don't see how Google can continue with its business model in Europe when Article 13 goes into effect.
I'm currently creating an online platform with user generated content. I'm based in Belgium, but if this bill passes, it leaves me no choice but to take my company abroad. Funny how the EU tries to compete with US startups and multinationals, with various incentives, and then tries to get this crap enforced on all of these same companies within the EU. Bunch of idiots. Although I live within the EU, I hope various co…