Live data from Hacker News

Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

twitter.com

141–150 of 443 posts

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#141

I think any change in this would be generational. I grew up eating meat, and I have no interest in meat substitutes. Also, the track record on substitute foods isn't good. Look at the health disasters caused by artificial sweeteners, artificial oils, etc.

"Look at the health disasters caused by artificial sweeteners, artificial oils, etc." - Can you point to some examples?

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#142

I live on and help operate a small family farm (230 head of grass fed cattle) and I don't think that meat substitutes will hurt our sales or margins, unless and until their quality results in a broad shift in societal attitudes that leads to meat itself becoming illegal. I do absolutely think that it will reduce the demand for industrially farmed, feedlot-fed, commodity-priced meat, and this is a good thing.

Hope you're right. Keep providing high quality red meat and you'll always have a customer here

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a ton of literal hatred for veganism and vegetarians in this world. I think there is a ton of literal hatred for vegans and vegetarians, who tend to position themselves as morally superior to meat eaters and brag about how they are kinder and gentler than meat eaters, often while being openly cruel people. They are frequently seemingly oblivious to the glaring contradictions between their self image and thei…

My daughter recently said something about "narcissistic ideology" - something that is adhered to, not because it's true, but because it gives a sense of moral superiority to the adherent. I think that's an interesting label for the type of person you had the misfortune to run into.

It's unfortunate because it gives a bad name to a generally positive life choice and because there's really no means to determine if the toxic vegetarians are simply a vocal minority.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#144

FWIW I think he's predicting something which is already beginning to happen. Carl's Jr. (Hardees to you midwestern/east coast folks) recently added Beyond Meat patties to their menu ( https://www.reuters.com/article/us-beyond-meat-carl-s-jr-idU... ). For a small price extra, you can get a not-farmed-meat burger and they're promoting it pretty heavily. I dropped in a while back, was surprised to see it on the menu, th…

Funnily enough low quality patties like fast food burgers have been using more soy protein as a filler for a long time. Maybe one day they'll be honest and sell it as 50% vegetarian burgers or something.

National:

McDonalds: "Yes, every patty is 100% real beef with no fillers, additives or preservatives." Burger King: "Our beef patties are made with 100% beef with no fillers, no preservatives, no additives, no nonsense." Wendy's: "100% pure beef across the menu"

Regional:

Carls Jr: "100% Pure Ground Beef." Sonic: "100% pure beef patty" Jack in the Box: "100 percent beef"

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you looking forward to them becoming extinct, though? What's the benefit to anyone of that? A vegan society could still keep sheep for example to keep grassland under control? Just a bit odd to look forward to an innocent species _being wiped off the face of the Earth_.

I was pointing out that the people who say we shouldn't eat meat haven't really thought it through. I would guess that this would be an unintended consequence of their actions and I've never heard it said - the only reason these animals exist is because we've bred them for food - if we don't eat them any more then they'll no longer exist.

I'm pretty sure the Animal Liberation, considered one of the founding blocks of militant vegetarians and vegans in occident, raised this question in… 1975. I think it would be like horses, you would still find (healthy, relatively happy) chicken, cows, pigs, in the countryside; but in smaller numbers and not tortured by millions in factories. No "unintended consequence" there.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#146

it seems inevitable that fake meat will reach a texture and taste level that's "good enough" for fast food titans to offer alongside the normal, bargain (dollar menu ish) type stuff. if you add in the economic arguments - fake meat being way cheaper logistically i'm guessing and only going to get cheaper, perhaps order of magnitude levels so - then i would wager that the lower-end options will be the fake meat stuff…

Fast Food Titans have been mixing in soy with meat for a while already.

There are some sketchy chicken dishes, like the subway chicken, who have claimed to be about half soy, although subway disputes it. But at least in terms of beef, I couldn't find a company in the top 5-6 fast food burgers that don't claim 100% beef.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#147

I think any change in this would be generational. I grew up eating meat, and I have no interest in meat substitutes. Also, the track record on substitute foods isn't good. Look at the health disasters caused by artificial sweeteners, artificial oils, etc.

Yeah, I don't eat meat at this point because of health problems, but I miss it, and have zero desire to switch to that. and you are absolutely correct on substitute foods.

In contrast, I'm only eating meat now because of health - along with Himalayan salt for electrolytes.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#148

Since we're making predictions here, I predict that shortly after we adopt meat substitutes, we'll start to question what's inside them. Then the conversation will change from meat substitutes being good and healthy to something akin to the GMO debate about meat substitutes not being natural. And just like GMOs, whether it's actually bad for you or not won't matter. This debate will be a proxy war between Big Meat an…

On a tangential note, I wish it were possible to buy foods specifically because they contain GMOs. I intentionally avoid buying foods labeled "non-GMO" in a feeble attempt to vote with my wallet.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#149
post #81

I was brought up vegetarian, and while I gave it up when I got married and had kids, I've never really grown to love the taste of meat. The thing I'm most annoyed by is that nice tasting veggie dishes are often being replaced in restaurants with horrible tasting meat-substitute dishes trying to capture the taste of beef or whatever. This is probably just me against the universe though.

There are many industrial complexes at play that's putting a constant negative pressure on the quality of our lives, including the quality of our food and food availability.

Re: Paul Graham on the Transition to Meat Substitutes

#150

I think any change in this would be generational. I grew up eating meat, and I have no interest in meat substitutes. Also, the track record on substitute foods isn't good. Look at the health disasters caused by artificial sweeteners, artificial oils, etc.

"Look at the health disasters caused by artificial sweeteners, artificial oils, etc." - Can you point to some examples?

Synthetic trans fats were used in food for decades, but turned out to be a public health disaster, causing huge numbers of deaths:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fat

Post reply on HN