I wonder how well this'd work on screenshots of websites.
This Cat Does Not Exist
111–120 of 189 posts
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#112Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#113meanwhile: This Pidgeon DOES exist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigmy_Pouter
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#114There's another one too: http://thesecatsdonotexist.com/
You're absolutely sure none of these exist? This look way too real: https://imgur.com/a/aQYjeL6
Or this one!
https://d2ph5fj80uercy.cloudfront.net/01/cat1971.jpg
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#115Can someone explain to me what I am looking at? :)
Someone recently posted https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ -- which shows a random AI-generated human face. This is a cat version, but it works out a lot worse. Some are fine, some are terrible.
I think that's on purpose - the training data appears to be all results from search for "cat pics"... captions and meme text and all.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#116A reload page button would be nice..
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
They look like Star Trek transporter accidents.
That could mean a lot of things. Are you saying that they look dead, fused with another cat, drastically younger, attacked by an interdimensional monster, cloned or are the evil alternate reality version of themselves?
All of the above.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Complete nightmare fuel. https://imgur.com/a/D4sRn5F
I raise you https://imgur.com/tNlpOd4
When I saw the first Google deepdream images, they made me physically nauseous.
But now, in 2019, I've fully acclimated such nightmare-fuel concoctions: "Oh look, another GAN cat!"
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#119I still can't shake the feeling that most of these StyleGAN images are cleverly overfitting and just showing the face of an already existing cat in its training data. (But would love to be proven wrong!)