Looks like there were some memes with watermarks in the training data https://i.imgur.com/iMOSUog.jpg
This Cat Does Not Exist
11–20 of 189 posts
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#12Some of these are dipping into the uncatney valley.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#13Cute idea, but about half of these have given me very weird/unrealistic results. For instance this[1] one which, while amusing as hell, isn't exactly convincing. https://i.imgur.com/g5bHmH6.png
looks like mighty fine kittens to me : https://i.imgur.com/wbZmNzY.jpg && https://i.imgur.com/rmxEkdC.jpg
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#14There's another one too: http://thesecatsdonotexist.com/
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#15This generates nightmare fuel: https://imgur.com/jw9OmFi
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#16... and thank God it doesn't. Just look at this poor fella!
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#17Curious, is cat more complex object than human's face for ML to be trained and produced?
It looks to me that cats as a whole are more complex than human faces. I suspect we would get similar results with full humans. Cats have huge variation in color and pose that faces do not. An additional factor is that most portraits have the background in a separate focal plane while most cats are photographed against a complex background.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#18Curious, is cat more complex object than human's face for ML to be trained and produced?
The human face training data was probably much more uniform: all well-lit photos of human faces in the center of the photo looking directly at the camera. Whereas the training set for this was probably any photos of cats, in any lighting conditions, with the cat in any pose.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#19Two creatures in this picture: http://imgur.com/TDeLYwF
One looks like a cat, the other...?
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#20Quick, someone make a slack plugin for this!