There's another one too: http://thesecatsdonotexist.com/
This Cat Does Not Exist
71–80 of 189 posts
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Author may want to implement a labelling method for users for a days to maybe train the discriminator a little bit better. Would be a cool human-in-the-loop exercise.
Yes something like this: http://www.whichfaceisreal.com/
Even in this[1] difficult comparison you can see the non-human repeating skin patterns on the right and the awkward teeth contour. Also hair-on-skin often looks wet and with unnatural bends.
When comparing wrinkly people then it gets a little harder.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#73Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#74Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#75I think this might be a well-done satire showcasing the pitfalls of having insufficient training data. It's magnificent. Half the cats are adorable and half are, I believe, creatures from "The Thing".
Also when you use a dataset containing watermarked stock photos and the watermark is treated as a signal instead of noise :) https://i.imgur.com/O1ZRwSF.jpg
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#76Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#77Curious, is cat more complex object than human's face for ML to be trained and produced?
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#78Can someone explain to me what I am looking at? :)
This is a cat version, but it works out a lot worse. Some are fine, some are terrible.