Live data from Hacker News

Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

nytimes.com

81–90 of 235 posts

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#81

Please have one minute of silence to remember this wonderful machine that gave us all so much... Kudos to all those who contributed to make this such an overwhelming success. Science FTW.

Earth minute or Martian minute?

Excellent question. I assumed that one mars minute differs from an earth minute but I just learned that they don't. Seconds, minutes and hours are universal. Hours in a day is what varies by planets, moons etc. Funny that I never thought of that before :)

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#82

Was looking through Opportunity's Wikipedia page, and found this cool comparison of the embedded systems used in Mars rovers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_embedded_compute... That lead me to the RAD6000 page, which was new to me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_RAD6000 "Reported to have a unit cost somewhere between US$200,000 and US$300,000, RAD6000 computers were released for sale in the general co…

I saw a video once saying that SpaceX uses general purpose computers on the rockets instead of specific purpose hardware. If I'm not mistaken, they amount to 6 and have a checking system to assure the output of them is the same.

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#83

I'm feeling humbled by NASA's achievements compared to those of our profession here wrt sustainability and longevity.

I built some warehousing apps in VFP 20 years ago and they're still running fine. Every time I go ship something the owner asks me to prune and reindex the DB and that's it, another year running smooth.

CA Clipper app that I updated to Visual Fox Pro back in 1998 is still chugging along running an oil company's accounts payable/receivable.

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#84
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More interesting would be when someone else from another species finds them in a couple of million years in the future and wonders what their purpose was all about.

Cassini was deliberately pushed into Saturn's atmosphere and destroyed (so as not to potentially contaminate habitable worlds) so we probably don't need to worry about that. Also, there's a great documentary TV series called "7 Days Out" on Netflix which covers the last week of the Cassini mission.

Thanks for the hint.

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#86

Please have one minute of silence to remember this wonderful machine that gave us all so much... Kudos to all those who contributed to make this such an overwhelming success. Science FTW.

Earth minute or Martian minute?

which is heavier? 10 lbs of stone or 10 lbs of feather?

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#87
post #23

Opportunity's and Spirit's original missions were planned to last 90 Martian days each. They ended up lasting over 8,000 combined. That is almost as impressive as getting the rovers to Mars in the first place.

That story is very much over sold. They defiantly designed the things with a longer lifespan in mind. NASA simply had more reasonable minimum specks so if they died on day 220 nobody would call the program a failure.

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Earth minute or Martian minute?

Excellent question. I assumed that one mars minute differs from an earth minute but I just learned that they don't. Seconds, minutes and hours are universal. Hours in a day is what varies by planets, moons etc. Funny that I never thought of that before :)

Surely this is effected by relativity?

Edit: Or rather should I say it’s relative... (lol?)

Re: Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission

#89
post #87
post #23

Opportunity's and Spirit's original missions were planned to last 90 Martian days each. They ended up lasting over 8,000 combined. That is almost as impressive as getting the rovers to Mars in the first place.

That story is very much over sold. They defiantly designed the things with a longer lifespan in mind. NASA simply had more reasonable minimum specks so if they died on day 220 nobody would call the program a failure.

Underpromise and over deliver :)
Post reply on HN