Live data from Hacker News

Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org

111–120 of 124 posts

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#111
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After the Germans surrendered my dad's division was scheduled to be transferred to the Pacific for the invasion of Japan. At least that is what they were told. He was happy to hear of the bombings on Nagasaki and Hiroshima since from his perspective it caused the Japanese to surrender. Of course it's debatable on whether or not those bombings did indeed cause the surrender of Japan. Politically the U.S. has not been…

It isn't debatable because we know hiroshima and nagasaki had no bearing on the japanese decision to surrender. If the nukes were the cause of japan's surrender, hiroshima would have been enough and nagasaki wouldn't have happened. Also, there is no ambiguity to the morality of hiroshima or nagasaki. No more than there is any ambiguity to the morality of nazi death camps. They were both racially driven war crimes and…

I don't know about you, but I think I would run up the white flag after being nuked once.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#112

What an interesting read. Also, is it just me or are there a surprising number of german related topics on the frontpage right now? "We only had one man working on it and they may have had ten thousand" This is why I always chuckle at the ww2 "documentaries" positing the possibility of german or japanese bomb. Nevermind that both parties were preoccupied fighting far stronger and larger opponents ( US, British Empire…

Very few documentaries mention this but the Allies won the war because of their colonies. The uranium used for the Manhattan project came from Congo for example. All the resources of South America and Africa were at their disposal.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't debatable because we know hiroshima and nagasaki had no bearing on the japanese decision to surrender. If the nukes were the cause of japan's surrender, hiroshima would have been enough and nagasaki wouldn't have happened. Also, there is no ambiguity to the morality of hiroshima or nagasaki. No more than there is any ambiguity to the morality of nazi death camps. They were both racially driven war crimes and…

I don't know about you, but I think I would run up the white flag after being nuked once .

The Japanese should have surrendered in 1943 AND THEY KNEW IT. Its easy to blame the evil Americans for nuking Hiroshima. Nobody ever talks about the Japanese government dragging out a losing war. The Japanese public themselves knew it though. Its why even today the military is disliked. All of Japan was supposed to go down in a blaze of glory- luckily the emperor regained his senses at the eleventh hour.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#114
post #105
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A superweapon is a convenient thing to blame one's surrender on. But if you look at the discussions the Japanese war cabinet had behind the scenes these days, it's clear that they were worried about an imminent Soviet invasion just as much as the bombs.

> But if you look at the discussions the Japanese war cabinet had behind the scenes these days, it's clear that they were worried about an imminent Soviet invasion just as much as the bombs. Can you post a source for these? Google hasn't been any help. English translations, obviously, would be preferred.

Wikipedia has a lengthy article on various debates and controversies on this broad subject (whether the bombs were justified or not), including Soviet role in it, and whether it made the second bomb unnecessary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombing...

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#115
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Von Weizsäcker, and his family, are extremely interesting. The father was a somewhat reluctant ambassador to Britain. The four brothers all were highly successful, as a physicist, a politician (President of Germany in the 90s), an economist, and a political scientist. I had the honor to study with the economist. I rarely get the explicit idea that someone is smarter or dumber than me. But with him, it was so obvious…

Richard von Weizsäcker (President of Germany) was fabulous. Every interview worth reading, every word well chosen. Nobody since has lived up to that high standard yet in my opinion.

Read his speach for 40 years end of WWII in Germany:

http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/Richard-v...

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#116
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Richard von Weizsäcker (President of Germany) was fabulous. Every interview worth reading, every word well chosen. Nobody since has lived up to that high standard yet in my opinion.

Read his speach for 40 years end of WWII in Germany: http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/DE/Richard-v...

English version: http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Reden...

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#117
post #98
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We had a much larger economy and resource potential than germany and japan. Yes, I once thought that it should have been surprising that Germany didn't get the bomb first. Upon more reading, the effort that the US threw at the project was simply staggering - nobody knew which was the best technique for how to do a bunch of different things, so the Americans tried all of them at the same time. No other participant i…

> No other participant in the war could have duplicated that level of effort. Effort aside, there's also luck. Americans couldn't assume that Germans haven't tried despite the lack of resources, and scored on first attempt by sheer chance. This is one of those races where even if you're very confident that you're faster than everybody else, you still give it everything you have, because the consequences of not winnin…

It was not by sheer chance that Groves et.al. showed up at Alamogordo with plutonium, in a sphere of exactly the right size, containing a carefully-constructed initiator, and surrounded by explosive blocks of exactly the right shape, with their detonators connected to timing circuitry specifically developed to have the necessary accuracy, and all components thoroughly tested. If it had not detonated, that would have been on account of a chance event.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#118
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But if you look at the discussions the Japanese war cabinet had behind the scenes these days, it's clear that they were worried about an imminent Soviet invasion just as much as the bombs. Can you post a source for these? Google hasn't been any help. English translations, obviously, would be preferred.

Wikipedia has a lengthy article on various debates and controversies on this broad subject (whether the bombs were justified or not), including Soviet role in it, and whether it made the second bomb unnecessary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombing...

It doesn't seem to have have transcripts of the "discussions the Japanese war cabinet had behind the scenes", which is specifically what you wanted people to look at in your former comment.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#119
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wikipedia has a lengthy article on various debates and controversies on this broad subject (whether the bombs were justified or not), including Soviet role in it, and whether it made the second bomb unnecessary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate_over_the_atomic_bombing...

It doesn't seem to have have transcripts of the "discussions the Japanese war cabinet had behind the scenes", which is specifically what you wanted people to look at in your former comment.

Transcriptions are not available, obviously, but the closest thing I've seen to date is "The Day Man Lost: Hiroshima, 6 August 1945", which is available in English. Compiled by the Pacific War Research Society, a group of Japanese historians, from accounts from officials and written records, their version of history does indeed claim that the Japanese government was pinning their hopes on the Soviet Union brokering a peace agreement with the United States and was deliberately delaying responses to the US until their hopes were dashed by the Soviet declaration of war. The use of atomic weapons was an additional impetus, not a deciding factor.

As an aside, the book makes for fascinating reading. Being compiled by Japanese from accounts by other Japanese, one has to be wary of a certain amount of face-saving and retconning, of course. However, it's the first I've seen that overlays the timeline of events occurring within the Japanese government with the US progress in the war.

Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]

#120
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After the Germans surrendered my dad's division was scheduled to be transferred to the Pacific for the invasion of Japan. At least that is what they were told. He was happy to hear of the bombings on Nagasaki and Hiroshima since from his perspective it caused the Japanese to surrender. Of course it's debatable on whether or not those bombings did indeed cause the surrender of Japan. Politically the U.S. has not been…

>I don't know if the bombings were morally right or wrong and can see the argument both ways. But from at least one drafted soldier's perspective they were a good thing. Soldiers volunteer to fight a war, civilians don't. If the Japanese had bombed LA, we wouldn't be having this conversation, every American would understand why this was morally wrong.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN