Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org
Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
1–10 of 124 posts
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#2Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#3Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#4The comments about how they see history being written, specifically about the German contributions, comes across as particularly naive but evident of men who were clearly distraught and disoriented.
And their predictions about Stalin and Russia were ominous but nearly correct several times over.
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#5>WEIZSÄCKER: I don't think we ought to make excuses now because we did not succeed, but we must admit that we didn't want to succeed. If we had put the same energy into it as the Americans and had wanted it as they did, it is quite certain that we would not have succeeded as they would have smashed up the factories.
>WEIZSÄCKER: One can say it might have been a much greater tragedy for the world if Germany had had the uranium bomb. Just imagine, if we had destroyed LONDON with uranium bombs it would not have ended the war, and when the war did end, it is still doubtful whether it would have been a good thing.
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#6As a German I would love to have read it in German or hear the audio files. Nevertheless an interesting piece of history.
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#7"We only had one man working on it and they may have had ten thousand"
This is why I always chuckle at the ww2 "documentaries" positing the possibility of german or japanese bomb. Nevermind that both parties were preoccupied fighting far stronger and larger opponents ( US, British Empire, Soviet Union, China ), they lacked the resources, economic power and infrastructure to construct one before the US. We had a much larger economy and resource potential than germany and japan. Just like we do today. It was a race neither had a chance of winning.
Another interesting read is the military's view on hiroshima and nagasaki. Most military leaders saw it as serving no military purpose. So ultimately, hiroshima and nagasaki were the largest human experimentation in ww2. It was a predominately a radiation test on civilian populations and cities. Something we'd continue doing on unsuspecting pacific islanders decades after ww2.
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#8Highlight for me: > WEIZSÄCKER: I don't think we ought to make excuses now because we did not succeed, but we must admit that we didn't want to succeed. If we had put the same energy into it as the Americans and had wanted it as they did, it is quite certain that we would not have succeeded as they would have smashed up the factories. > WEIZSÄCKER: One can say it might have been a much greater tragedy for the world i…
I had the honor to study with the economist. I rarely get the explicit idea that someone is smarter or dumber than me. But with him, it was so obvious I skipped right over jealousy straight to awe and enjoyment.
There is also a play, “Copenhagen”, featuring three or four possible versions of a meeting of WeizsÄcker. Heisenberg, and Bohr.
Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#9Re: Conversations among German Nuclear Physicists at Farm Hall (1945) [pdf]
#10Fascinating stuff, really interesting characters. I for one never knew the Germans were pursuing fission for the production of "engines". Do yourselves a favor and read the entire transcript. The comments about how they see history being written, specifically about the German contributions, comes across as particularly naive but evident of men who were clearly distraught and disoriented. And their predictions about S…