31–40 of 142 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[deleted]
Why do you expect some random member of the public to obey an arbitrary rule from the infosec community that they don't even all agree on?
He also got a personal visit from an unnamed Apple executive.
Only in the land of philanthropy is such a headline a thing, or even a PR move. So instead of giving the guardian of said teenager 200k to do with as they/he/she pleases in the interest of the child, you set up a education funding scheme? But when the government does it, it's what?
Unremarkable and not newsworthy?
Only in the land of philanthropy is such a headline a thing, or even a PR move. So instead of giving the guardian of said teenager 200k to do with as they/he/she pleases in the interest of the child, you set up a education funding scheme? But when the government does it, it's what?
He also got a personal visit from an unnamed Apple executive.
Source?
Only in the land of philanthropy is such a headline a thing, or even a PR move. So instead of giving the guardian of said teenager 200k to do with as they/he/she pleases in the interest of the child, you set up a education funding scheme? But when the government does it, it's what?
A lot of people are jackwagons and will spend the money on whatever they want instead of their child's education. This way Apple gets to make sure it goes to the child's future.
Source: Had to finance a big portion of college on MasterCard.
Only in the land of philanthropy is such a headline a thing, or even a PR move. So instead of giving the guardian of said teenager 200k to do with as they/he/she pleases in the interest of the child, you set up a education funding scheme? But when the government does it, it's what?
> when the government does it, it's what? Unremarkable and not newsworthy?