Live data from Hacker News

Machine Learning for Everyone

vas3k.com

21–22 of 22 posts

Re: Machine Learning for Everyone

#21
post #19

I’ve never seen genetic algorithms considered to be a subcategory of reinforcement learning before. > Genetic algorithms are considered as part of reinforcement learning Uh, by who? Sure, there are similarities, but GAs != RL.

I do not think the divisions so sharp. Many formulations in RL can be seen as implicitly defining a particular (set of) differential equations. One can do something similar for certain simple GAs and write them as equations of an evolutionary game where stable strategies are good solutions to the objective. The RL diff eqs also fall in this class. Another view point is to note that John Holland, inventor of GAs, was…

> I do not think the divisions so sharp.

Yeah, I agree and see where they're coming from, just wasn't sure if both RLs and GAs had been generalized into the same framework. Generalized to diff eqs is interesting.

Re: Machine Learning for Everyone

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't see how it would be a problem for a teacher to assign reading material about how he is having sex?

god forbid teachers have sex

Nobody is saying they shouldn't. They shouldn't talk about their sex lives to their students though, just like you shouldn't talk about your sex life to your coworkers.
Post reply on HN