> As we can see here, this is obvious.
Funny and to the point. That’s kind of what I saw every time before. Now I’m learning with Fastai, and feel like finally someone made it easy for the rest of us.
Machine Learning for Everyone
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#12Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#13The predictive analytics of these systems are strikingly close to reality. In fact, the AI is ahead of fantasy because the technology is capable of training itself through machine learning algorithms by using the data sets and past experiences.
Here I another article about: https://mobinspire.com/blogs/introduction-to-categories-of-m...
Will be glad to hear your thoughts on this.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#14I love the first paragraph:
> thick academic trilogies filled with theorems ... or fishy fairytales about artificial intelligence, data-science magic, and jobs of the future.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#15Because of the metaphor used in the opening sentence, I cannot assign it as reading for my high school students. Too bad!
Just reach out to the author(s?) and ask for a 'high school' safe version.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#16This is a pretty good overview, though rather hand-wavy (eg the overview of RL here gives a VERY course idea of how this stuff works in practice). And the characterization of existing similar overviews as either overly technical or overly flimsy/fishy is a bit much ; this itself links to some things like Machine Learning for Humans (https://medium.com/machine-learning-for-humans/supervised-le... , or see eg http://brohrer.github.io/blog.html#how_machine_learning) , and in general as acknowledged by 'Yes, again' this is well trodden territory. Still, nice pictures ; could make for a great video , perhaps.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#17I’ve never seen genetic algorithms considered to be a subcategory of reinforcement learning before.
> Genetic algorithms are considered as part of reinforcement learning
Uh, by who? Sure, there are similarities, but GAs != RL.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#18I’ve never seen genetic algorithms considered to be a subcategory of reinforcement learning before. > Genetic algorithms are considered as part of reinforcement learning Uh, by who? Sure, there are similarities, but GAs != RL.
I guess you could say that there is an objective function to maximize and instead of thinking about generations you could consider the same individuals over and over again... That's my intuition of the similarities they could consider, but I agree with you that GAs are not RL.
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#19I’ve never seen genetic algorithms considered to be a subcategory of reinforcement learning before. > Genetic algorithms are considered as part of reinforcement learning Uh, by who? Sure, there are similarities, but GAs != RL.
I do not think the divisions so sharp. Many formulations in RL can be seen as implicitly defining a particular (set of) differential equations. One can do something similar for certain simple GAs and write them as equations of an evolutionary game where stable strategies are good solutions to the objective. The RL diff eqs also fall in this class.
Another view point is to note that John Holland, inventor of GAs, was more interested in the application of GAs in classifier systems than as objects of study in and of themselves. His work on the bucket brigade algorithm, a type of TD-learning, for credit assignment in complex reinforcement learning scenarios was first-rate and sadly still under-attended. In that setting, GAs were a search operator, focused on exploration while bucket brigade was for credit assignment. While GAs can be shown to be capable of doing adaptation as well as exploration, they really were meant to be part of a bigger whole by their inventor.
In fact, Deepmind's AlphaStar for Starcraft problem formulation can be seen as fitting into the learning classifier system framework where learners are themselves quite powerful neural networks. See: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/2777...
Re: Machine Learning for Everyone
#20Is embedding a 3brown1blue vid ok?