Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree, and this is why I distinguish college, which is a place that undergrads go for 4 years, from university, which is the larger institution as a whole. For certain characteristics of colleges, I believe it is fair to see students and parents as informed consumers; e.g., when considering cost and prestige, they probably do a good job. Without anything to substantiate this, I would also guess that students do a r…
I think GP was referring to the undergrad program. For what it's worth, I haven't met many students who knew much about their degree program's curricula or their general education requirements. Not knowing this makes them seem ineffective at evaluating the college. Given all the stories I hear of, for example, art students surprised that they cannot find jobs, I'm not sure I trust incoming students as estimators of e…
Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#12Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#13While these publications try to rank universities, I engage in the smaller task of trying to rank undergraduate colleges: http://college.mychances.net/college-rankings.php The decision to rank them based on students' decisions of where to attend may be questionable, but at least the "science" is straightforward.
Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#14My last startup was in higher ed, and the stories about manipulating ranking are amazing. Everybody knows what goes into the rankings, and everybody manipulates the inputs. As an example, one of the inputs is percentage of alumni who donate. So one large school has a gigantic push every year to get just one dollar from every alumni that they can. I actually sat in on a seminar where somebody from the university broke…
Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#15While these publications try to rank universities, I engage in the smaller task of trying to rank undergraduate colleges: http://college.mychances.net/college-rankings.php The decision to rank them based on students' decisions of where to attend may be questionable, but at least the "science" is straightforward.
Is there a section where I, as a college student, can just add my statistics?
Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#16But more often than not, I find that university ranking is mostly to measure how endowed a university is, no pun intended. If a university--particularly a well-established research university--were so good, why couldn't it turn a mediocre student into a star student?
(Went to Arizona State; not exactly high on the US rankings)
Re: Questionable Science Behind Academic Rankings
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a section where I, as a college student, can just add my statistics?
Yes, definitely. It's a 2 step process that probably has way too much friction right now (and at some point soon I'll be asking HN for feedback, but that's not for right now). (1) Create for an account ( http://www.mychances.net/signup.php ). Once you confirm, it takes you into step (2) automatically, creating your profile and then letting you add the colleges that you got decisions from.
* For Northwestern, my GPA was very low while my test scores were probably abnormally high.