Poor Mac users
Why poor? Why post something like this without an explanation? Does it make you feel good?
Maybe you didn't know that Mac has had office for more than a decade.
121–130 of 139 posts
Poor Mac users
Why poor? Why post something like this without an explanation? Does it make you feel good?
Maybe you didn't know that Mac has had office for more than a decade.
Is it sandboxed?
Apparently, though it seems to have been granted quite a few exceptions: $ codesign -d --entitlements - /Applications/Microsoft\ Word.app/ Executable=/Applications/Microsoft Word.app/Contents/MacOS/Microsoft Word com.apple.security.cs.disable-library-validation com.apple.developer.aps-environment production com.apple.security.assets.pictures.read-only com.apple.security.temporary-exception.sbpl (allow file-read* file…
Office was available for Mac for many years. The news here is that Office is now in the Mac App Store, not that big of a news. Anyhow, worth noting that the Mac versions of Office are no near to the Windows versions. They are thin clients with only a portion of the win capabilities, and those which exists are buggy, to say the least. If I had a Mac, I would go to G Suite, which gives better capabilities for 99.9% of…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I knew they've had full Office since forever. I just didn't know if the App Store version itself was full Office or a mobile/web Office like on the iOS App Store.
According to this post [0], Microsoft use a "shared Office codebase for Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android". Before the individual iOS Office apps, Microsoft had an "Office mobile" app which may well have been a web app (though I can't find anything on that either way). [0] https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Office-365-Blog/Share...
At very least, from my experience, I believe the iOS, Mac and Windows do share the same underlying engine. The web version looks like a reimplementation that reimplements all its weird quirks… but there're still minor difference here and there.
I have to deal with few Japanese documentation which uses a relatively obscure feature exposed only to Japanese version of Office (e.g. I think it present in all versions now as "Enclosed Character") and so far every Word implementation fail to render that in the way it's expected to be rendered, but it renders consistently in all versions of Microsoft Office {Windows, iOS, Mac}.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. Go to Office365.com 2. Login 3. Do you want to stay logged in? 4. Is your information up to date? 5. Office / OneCloud homepage ("Good evening"). Press 'Install Office' (its a secondary/white button that blends into background, whereas 'New doc' is a blue button). (20 URL redirects) 6. Installs page. Press 'Install Office' again. 7. Still Installs page, now with banner that says 'Your Office 365 subscription info…
> Office365 There's your problem right there. Just buy a perpetual Office license. The awful Adobe-style subscription model for desktop software that barely ever changes is ridiculous .
There are some services that are so worth the money that I am happy to pay for: Office 365, Dropbox, and GSuite. I am as much of a cheapskate as the next guy, but it makes sense to pay for services that help get work done and/or make life easier. I am curious if Microsoft is paying Apple a 30% cut, or if they got a better deal.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
On this note, Apple's 30% flat tax is a poor decision. I wonder how much of a hit Apple would take if the first $5000 per year per app was rebated. There's a long tail of mild-moderately successful apps that provide value to some, but may not be economic to continue. With this system, devs could re-invest ~50% more funds into their early-stage product if they could. It may pay for itself in future success and better…
If you include all the factors like market share, cost of hardware, flat tax, ecosystem tie-in, development costs, then it becomes doubtful whether it makes sense to support MacOS anyway. I'm pretty certain that for most smaller companies MacOS support is a money sink and they just don't calculate the development costs correctly or they want to support the platform for strategical or ideological reasons.
Or are you arguing that other platforms have a better developer ROI? That's intriguing. Which ones, and why?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How many licenses of GSuite to you maintain? One license, $5 / month. Seems reasonable. I have six family members. $360 / year for GSuite, that's untenable to me.
I paid $400+ a year for personal accounts since GSuite went premium. I just switched over to another provider because I reached a tipping point of not being able to tolerate GSuite support - it is horrible. horrible. horrible. horrible. Took 1+ and 3+ weeks to resolve the only two minor issues we've ever had. Support replies were a series of unrelated prefilled replies, it seems whoever is on the other end is just ke…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you include all the factors like market share, cost of hardware, flat tax, ecosystem tie-in, development costs, then it becomes doubtful whether it makes sense to support MacOS anyway. I'm pretty certain that for most smaller companies MacOS support is a money sink and they just don't calculate the development costs correctly or they want to support the platform for strategical or ideological reasons.
The Mac has an installed base of 100 million. If you think about the addressable market for a "smaller company", that's plenty. Saying that the Mac is too small for smaller companies to bother with is like saying that Germany is too small to run a small business in. It's demonstrably false. Or are you arguing that other platforms have a better developer ROI? That's intriguing. Which ones, and why?
I'm not saying that there aren't some companies who make money on the app store, of course, that would be nonsense.