Zillow CEO: startups trying to disrupt real estate commissions will fail (2012)

Post by gnopgnip » Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 12:19 AM UTC

StillBored wrote: post #113

clairity wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "That being said, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and their local branches are the definition of a cartel." NAR was actually investigated by the federal government (FTC i think? ), who concluded much the same, but lobbying buried the report and nothing came of it. MLS's maintain power by strictly controlling access to information. they have the most up-to-date and the most detailed information about prop…

Part of the problem is that most realtors want it that way. I live in Austin, and the push for a few years now has been to have a "silent market" where a buyer picks a "full service" realtor (AKA full commission), and gets a week or so jump on properties being listed in the MLS. This gives them a better chance to get the property before the MLS hordes descend and start bidding it up. The part I've never understood is…

Post by lotsofpulp » Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 12:20 AM UTC

StillBored wrote: post #113

clairity wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "That being said, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and their local branches are the definition of a cartel." NAR was actually investigated by the federal government (FTC i think? ), who concluded much the same, but lobbying buried the report and nothing came of it. MLS's maintain power by strictly controlling access to information. they have the most up-to-date and the most detailed information about prop…

Part of the problem is that most realtors want it that way. I live in Austin, and the push for a few years now has been to have a "silent market" where a buyer picks a "full service" realtor (AKA full commission), and gets a week or so jump on properties being listed in the MLS. This gives them a better chance to get the property before the MLS hordes descend and start bidding it up. The part I've never understood is…

Post by gnopgnip » Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 12:23 AM UTC

anonymous5133 wrote: post #173

ryaniscool wrote: post #33

Over the last two years I've bought a couple of properties and I see the value of realtors as professional negotiators and experts on real estate laws and contracts. That being said, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and their local branches are the definition of a cartel. My parents owned a real estate agency when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s. Back then, the cost of selling and marketing real estate…

What about services like redfin? They advertise their fee at only 2%.

Post by lowercased » Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 12:25 AM UTC

garagemc2 wrote: post #167

ryaniscool wrote: post #33

Over the last two years I've bought a couple of properties and I see the value of realtors as professional negotiators and experts on real estate laws and contracts. That being said, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and their local branches are the definition of a cartel. My parents owned a real estate agency when I was growing up in the 80s and 90s. Back then, the cost of selling and marketing real estate…

Wow, in the UK it is about 1 - 2%.

Post by onlyrealcuzzo » Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 12:30 AM UTC

mediaman wrote: post #102

picodguyo wrote: post #97

I've bought and sold on separate occasions through Redfin and saw no difference between their service for 1% and my previous transactions with a traditional realtor for 5%. They both took me around to see properties, provided neighborhood and property insights, acted as my negotiating proxy, and guided the closing process. I don't understand how Redfin can charge so little, but as it stands today I wouldn't dream of…

Redfin charges 1% for selling the house. They still pay 3% to the buyer's broker. The total fee is therefore 4%, versus the normal 6%, where both sides get 3%.