Live data from Hacker News

Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

forbes.com

31–40 of 294 posts

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#31
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that the police use polygraphs simply as a 'primed' question-asking session for people who agree to take them. It is no different from sitting down and asking someone questions, except maybe they will believe you can tell that they are lying, and so might be more honest. The polygraph doesn't have to be evidence because your answers to questions are evidence by themselves. Whether you are hooked u…

> Whether you are hooked up to a polygraph is irrelevant. I'm going to go with strongly disagree here.

So you're willing to argue that the output of a polygraph is evidence of something in absence of any responses you give during questioning?

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#32
post #14

Relevant excerpt: > “The undersigned finds that a biometric feature is analogous to the 20 nonverbal, physiological responses elicited during a polygraph test, which are used to determine guilt or innocence, and are considered testimonial.” So it's analogous to a passcode because you're divulging something stored by your body, as opposed to e.g. a metal key which is artificial. Tangentially related, it's astounding t…

My understanding is that the police use polygraphs simply as a 'primed' question-asking session for people who agree to take them. It is no different from sitting down and asking someone questions, except maybe they will believe you can tell that they are lying, and so might be more honest. The polygraph doesn't have to be evidence because your answers to questions are evidence by themselves. Whether you are hooked u…

In this respect they're not really any different from an officer administering a field sobriety test or a breathalyzer to someone they've stopped for a suspected DUI: these prime the suspect to give more information than legally required.

And worse, these will provide opportunities for the state to build probable cause for a stop that otherwise might not exist.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#33

Any idea if and how this ruling (if upheld) can be used to refuse phone seizures / password requests by CBP when entering the country? The ruling relies on the 5th amendment so its scope is limited to American citizens I guess. And whatever the rule of law it’s probably not a good idea to piss off a CBP agent... but still, it’d be nice to be able to travel to the US without having to wipe one’s phone and social media…

There is a Border Search Exception to the 4th Amendment established by the courts; this ruling has no relevance at at port of entry.

It has no relevance to the Border Patrol within 100 miles of a US border or coastline, which is even more ridiculous.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#34
post #29

This might be a good time to let others know: Android (at least my OnePlus) has a "Lockdown" mode in the shutdown menu that locks the screen and prevents the usage of the biometric methods. You have to use the password. This is good because passwords have already been hashed out in court and are unequivocally protected by the fifth amendment; you don't have to tell an officer your password (and entering it for them c…

In iOS 11 and higher, you can disable Touch ID by pressing the power button 5 times in quick succession:

https://www.macrumors.com/2017/08/17/ios-11-emergency-sos-di...

> In iOS 11, Apple has added an "Emergency SOS" feature that's designed to give users a quick and easy way to summon emergency services should the need arise. As it turns out, there's a secondary benefit to Emergency SOS - it's also a way to quickly and discreetly disable Touch ID. ... This is a handy hidden feature because it allows Touch ID to be disabled discreetly in situations where someone might be able to force a phone to be unlocked with a fingerprint, such as a robbery or an arrest. With Touch ID disabled in this way, there is no way to physically unlock an iPhone with a finger without the device's passcode.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#35
post #29

This might be a good time to let others know: Android (at least my OnePlus) has a "Lockdown" mode in the shutdown menu that locks the screen and prevents the usage of the biometric methods. You have to use the password. This is good because passwords have already been hashed out in court and are unequivocally protected by the fifth amendment; you don't have to tell an officer your password (and entering it for them c…

iPhone too. Press the power button five times and it goes into password only mode.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#36

I won't believe this ruling is safe until it goes thru higher levels. The Executive Branch has over the past 2 decades has shown a large propensity for attempts to disregard the 4th and 5th amendments, and I see no change in this posture or the attempts to subvert them with the current political climate.

There is a high probability that this will be challenged at a higher level.

Let’s hope the Supreme Court hears it and it stands.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#37

Relevant excerpt: > “The undersigned finds that a biometric feature is analogous to the 20 nonverbal, physiological responses elicited during a polygraph test, which are used to determine guilt or innocence, and are considered testimonial.” So it's analogous to a passcode because you're divulging something stored by your body, as opposed to e.g. a metal key which is artificial. Tangentially related, it's astounding t…

I'm not sure how the courts will differentiate between biometric data related to authentication and biometric data from blood tests, breathalyzers or DNA tests. The latter are, in a sense, examples of forcing you to divulge something stored in your body.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#38
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Whether you are hooked up to a polygraph is irrelevant. I'm going to go with strongly disagree here.

So you're willing to argue that the output of a polygraph is evidence of something in absence of any responses you give during questioning?

I'm arguing that the idea that anyone is allowed to connect anything to me while they ask me questions is perverse, reprehensible, and absurd.

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#39
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought that polygraphs were not accepted as evidence in court, but are still used by some government and private agencies. Also, just curious, have they been discredited as in that double-blind trials show no more than a 50/50 chance of being correct (i.e., flipping a coin)? Or is it that a high enough percentage of people will fail them even if innocent, or pass them even if guilty? The thing I don't like about t…

> I thought that polygraphs were not accepted as evidence in court... Only if you "pass". Fail one and admissible or not, it'll be brought up.

[deleted]

Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules

#40

I won't believe this ruling is safe until it goes thru higher levels. The Executive Branch has over the past 2 decades has shown a large propensity for attempts to disregard the 4th and 5th amendments, and I see no change in this posture or the attempts to subvert them with the current political climate.

The judicial branch and the legislature have also been quite hostile to the 4th during that period. Its absolutely not a problem isolated to the executive.
Post reply on HN