Earlier quoted context omitted.
My understanding is that the police use polygraphs simply as a 'primed' question-asking session for people who agree to take them. It is no different from sitting down and asking someone questions, except maybe they will believe you can tell that they are lying, and so might be more honest. The polygraph doesn't have to be evidence because your answers to questions are evidence by themselves. Whether you are hooked u…
> Whether you are hooked up to a polygraph is irrelevant. I'm going to go with strongly disagree here.
Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
31–40 of 294 posts
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#32Relevant excerpt: > “The undersigned finds that a biometric feature is analogous to the 20 nonverbal, physiological responses elicited during a polygraph test, which are used to determine guilt or innocence, and are considered testimonial.” So it's analogous to a passcode because you're divulging something stored by your body, as opposed to e.g. a metal key which is artificial. Tangentially related, it's astounding t…
My understanding is that the police use polygraphs simply as a 'primed' question-asking session for people who agree to take them. It is no different from sitting down and asking someone questions, except maybe they will believe you can tell that they are lying, and so might be more honest. The polygraph doesn't have to be evidence because your answers to questions are evidence by themselves. Whether you are hooked u…
And worse, these will provide opportunities for the state to build probable cause for a stop that otherwise might not exist.
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#33Any idea if and how this ruling (if upheld) can be used to refuse phone seizures / password requests by CBP when entering the country? The ruling relies on the 5th amendment so its scope is limited to American citizens I guess. And whatever the rule of law it’s probably not a good idea to piss off a CBP agent... but still, it’d be nice to be able to travel to the US without having to wipe one’s phone and social media…
There is a Border Search Exception to the 4th Amendment established by the courts; this ruling has no relevance at at port of entry.
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#34This might be a good time to let others know: Android (at least my OnePlus) has a "Lockdown" mode in the shutdown menu that locks the screen and prevents the usage of the biometric methods. You have to use the password. This is good because passwords have already been hashed out in court and are unequivocally protected by the fifth amendment; you don't have to tell an officer your password (and entering it for them c…
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/08/17/ios-11-emergency-sos-di...
> In iOS 11, Apple has added an "Emergency SOS" feature that's designed to give users a quick and easy way to summon emergency services should the need arise. As it turns out, there's a secondary benefit to Emergency SOS - it's also a way to quickly and discreetly disable Touch ID. ... This is a handy hidden feature because it allows Touch ID to be disabled discreetly in situations where someone might be able to force a phone to be unlocked with a fingerprint, such as a robbery or an arrest. With Touch ID disabled in this way, there is no way to physically unlock an iPhone with a finger without the device's passcode.
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#35This might be a good time to let others know: Android (at least my OnePlus) has a "Lockdown" mode in the shutdown menu that locks the screen and prevents the usage of the biometric methods. You have to use the password. This is good because passwords have already been hashed out in court and are unequivocally protected by the fifth amendment; you don't have to tell an officer your password (and entering it for them c…
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#36I won't believe this ruling is safe until it goes thru higher levels. The Executive Branch has over the past 2 decades has shown a large propensity for attempts to disregard the 4th and 5th amendments, and I see no change in this posture or the attempts to subvert them with the current political climate.
There is a high probability that this will be challenged at a higher level.
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#37Relevant excerpt: > “The undersigned finds that a biometric feature is analogous to the 20 nonverbal, physiological responses elicited during a polygraph test, which are used to determine guilt or innocence, and are considered testimonial.” So it's analogous to a passcode because you're divulging something stored by your body, as opposed to e.g. a metal key which is artificial. Tangentially related, it's astounding t…
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Whether you are hooked up to a polygraph is irrelevant. I'm going to go with strongly disagree here.
So you're willing to argue that the output of a polygraph is evidence of something in absence of any responses you give during questioning?
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I thought that polygraphs were not accepted as evidence in court, but are still used by some government and private agencies. Also, just curious, have they been discredited as in that double-blind trials show no more than a 50/50 chance of being correct (i.e., flipping a coin)? Or is it that a high enough percentage of people will fail them even if innocent, or pass them even if guilty? The thing I don't like about t…
> I thought that polygraphs were not accepted as evidence in court... Only if you "pass". Fail one and admissible or not, it'll be brought up.
Re: Feds Can't Force You to Unlock Your iPhone with Finger or Face, Judge Rules
#40I won't believe this ruling is safe until it goes thru higher levels. The Executive Branch has over the past 2 decades has shown a large propensity for attempts to disregard the 4th and 5th amendments, and I see no change in this posture or the attempts to subvert them with the current political climate.