Earlier quoted context omitted.
Businesses generally make decisions on economic interest aligning with incentive structure. It is not personal. Victims are specifically targetted, or some sort of personal boundary is violated. It can get very personal. We might sometimes talk about someone being a victim of an impersonal force. For example, someome being injured as a result of a tsunami. However, excessively attaching to the narrative of being a vi…
> However, excessively attaching to the narrative of being a victim [...] There is no particular indication that the OP was calling forth the grand "victim narrative," or comparing themselves to sexual assault survivors in any way. > Victims are specifically targetted, or some sort of personal boundary is violated. It can get very personal. That's a mischaracterization of the word, focusing on a subset of the cases w…
As I said, being a victim of an impersonal force can happen in the business world too.
Whether the acting force is personal or impersonal, the victim usually experiences (1) the force personally and (2) feels helplessness at the situation. The latter is kinda strange to me in the context of a business setting given the common narratives around self-reliance and exploiting opportunities in the business and startup subculture.
Thing is, I don’t see much at stake besides time, stress, and inconvenience. Maybe this is an appeal to public opinion get some leverage over Stripe? If not, and they really want to be in the victimhood narrative as an entrepreneur, sure, go ahead. I don’t see how such an orientation will help someone succeed as an entrepreneur.